Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Picasso Comes to Palestine

A Picasso comes to the PalestiniansBy Kareem Khadder, CNN


June 28, 2011 4:43 a.m. EDT


Security guards keep close to the "Buste De Femme" by Pablo Picasso. It's on loan from a museum in the Netherlands.STORY HIGHLIGHTS


"Buste De Femme" was painted by Pablo Picasso in 1943; it's housed in the Netherlands


It's being displayed for one month in the West Bank city of Ramallah


Picasso used his art to express his feelings about the Spanish Civil War


Art specialist says the work has much to say about today's divide in the Middle East


Ramallah, West Bank (CNN) -- In a small showroom in the West Bank city of Ramallah, two Palestinian security guards carefully watch over a masterpiece by one of the most famous artists in modern history.






The "Buste De Femme," painted by Pablo Picasso in 1943, is estimated to be worth $7 million. It was borrowed from the Van Abbemuseum in Eindhoven, the Netherlands, by the International Academy of Art Palestine for a monthlong display in the West Bank.






Khaled Horani, art director of the academy, says the project took two years of negotiations, preparations and overcoming some political obstacles.






"This is the first time in history where a masterpiece of Picasso comes to Palestine in the occupied territories and also the first time we are going to show a masterpiece to the Palestinians," Horani told CNN.






While Horani acknowledges that just some 20 kilometers (about 12.4 miles) away, there are many contemporary masterpieces in Jerusalem museums. He is quick to point out the limitations for art lovers who live in the West Bank.






"It's not accessible for Palestinians from the West Bank to go there and see the artwork," making reference to Israeli security restrictions. "This raises the questions around the political situation and art in general and its accessibility," Horani said.






Painted just a few years after the Spanish Civil War, the "Buste De Femme" one of Picasso famous paintings. The Spanish artist wanted to express his feelings about the bloody war that had torn apart his homeland.






The painting took a 24-hour journey from the Netherlands to the West BankProfessor Lynda Morris of Norwich University College of the Arts in England and a specialist on Picasso, compared it with the political situation in the West Bank.






She said Picasso strived to understand both sides of the Spanish Civil War, and that holds lessons for today. "... Probably in the West, we know much more of the Israeli side more than the Palestinian side, and the importance to begin to address that balance," Morris told CNN.






Twenty feet away in an adjacent room of the academy, the special packing crate for the painting has been put on exhibit as well with the shipping label "From Eindhoven to Palestine" displayed prominently.






"This is the smallest museum and this box will be part of the exhibition," Horani told CNN in an advance preview of the painting.






He said the painting's 24-hour journey from the Netherlands to the West Bank was documented as it made its way to Tel Aviv. It was then escorted by an Israeli security firm to Qalandia checkpoint and then on to Ramallah.






The painting exhibition, which officially opened its doors to the public on Friday, was attended by Palestinians and international art lovers.






Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad went to the opening. He said the painting would go back to the Netherlands taking with it a little bit of the region with it.






"Destination Palestine, by itself, is of great significance to us," Fayyad said. "It is really moving to see this great work of Picasso is here and this portrait goes back to Eindhoven and part of Palestine will be with it," Fayyad told CNN after touring the exhibition.






"This is really a big thing.






--Christine Hadid, Palestinian architect RELATED TOPICS


Pablo Picasso


Painting


Palestine


Middle East


Ramallah


Art connoisseur Ola Abu Gharbieh said seeing the work in the West Bank made her proud.






"Palestinians are artistic. They are fond of art, and they had the chance and opportunity to bring such a universal and international work of art here in Palestine, and I wish to have similar experiences in the future."






Christine Hadid, a Palestinian architect and a self-avowed art lover, said the exhibit helped break through common stereotypes people hold about Palestinian society.






"This is really a big thing. We can show the world we can do something like this. Our life is not only focused on war and on all the bad things that happen to us while we are living in closure" Hadid said.






"This breaks all closures to Ramallah and Palestine. Maybe next time we will have a masterpiece by another artist -- Van Gogh or someone else. It's a first step for bigger events hopefully."




Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Importance of Obama's successful Middle East policies

CNN Poll: 75% of Americans Approve of Obama Personally


President Barack Obama retains strong personal appeal even as his overall job approval rating has weakened.


An overwhelming number of Americans — 75 percent — say they give President Obama a thumbs up regarding approval of him as a person, according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll released on Wednesday.


CNN notes that “Obama's strength remains his personal appeal” and adds that a “plurality of Republicans” also like him personally, though their positive views of the president are apparently trumped by economic jitters.


"Obama's approval among Republicans spiked after bin Laden's death, and no one expected it to stay that high for another 18 months. But the White House is probably worried more about the much smaller drops among independents and even Democrats. Those shifts are likely due to concerns about the economy, particularly unemployment," adds the CNN pollster.


In the new survey, only 48 percent of respondents say they approve of how Obama is handling his job, down 6 points from late May, while 48 percent say they disapprove, up 3 points from late last month.


Considering economic worries, including unemployment, gasoline prices, and the federal deficit, Obama’s poll numbers appear strong compared to previous presidents during bad times.


Presidents Reagan and Clinton, both viewed highly favorable in polls today, hit approval lows of 35 and 37 percent, respectively, during their presidencies.


President George W. Bush left the White House with an approval rating of just 22 percent, among the lowest for any president since polls have been conducted scientifically.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Sunday, June 5, 2011

From Mohamed Ameen

Lack of right education and employment:

The Root causes 1. Absolutist monarchies and presidents-for-life combined corruption with repression It was impossible for "imperialist" powers to do what they have done without the active collaboration of corrupt elites within these countries and in a specific cultural soil. 2. In Egypt alone, some 80 million net new jobs are required over the next 15 years just to keep pace with the population explosion. Same story of unemployment in many other Arab States. 3. All the Arab states together, with their combined population of 350 million, produce less in economic terms than Italy's 60 million people. Only three percent of the Libyan population works in the oil sector. What exactly did the rest of the population do? Official youth unemployment is at 26 percent in a rich oil-producing country like Saudi Arabia, while the unofficial rate in the countries of North Africa's Maghreb region lies at 70 percent. One third of the people of Mauritania and See more... Yemen, and one fifth of Egyptians, live on less than $2 a day. 4. The Syrian regime, born out of a coup, has, in the name of resistance to Israel, transformed into a repressive regime resembling a National Socialist society, where advancement is closed to all but the elite few. 5. The Arabs have taken to the streets without burning flags, but with extraordinary passion and generosity, and while employing peaceful means are demanding freedom and the recognition of their dignity. They know well that with freedom, comes bread. Hence they demand the removal of the autocrats, who have usurped their rights. 6. To be absolutely fair: There are certainly external pressures and there could also be marginal plots instigated and supplied from outside, and there is also pressure by the fundamentalists; but the protests in Syria -- as in other Arab countries -- are primarily a genuine movement of the people to claim democratic rights and social justice. I strongly feel that it is a big and serious responsibility of committed and well respected Muslim portals like yours to create the correct public opinion of Muslim Umma of the world towards the Arabian crisis. If your medium is going to care too much about individual Muslim opinions, freedom of speech, giving analysis on Libyan crisis and so on, and then make the Muslim individuals to decide on the best solution, it is not going to work effectively in forming a strong collective Muslim public opinion in unseating Autocrats Since Muslim nations, OIC, the Arab League el al are incapable of bringing the necessary regime change by dumping murderous tyrants into the dust bin history, whether we like it or not, we have to seek the support of other powerful non-Muslim nations which go along our line of thinking. Going back to my Iraq story. The newspapers that I used to read : Radiance, Impact, Crescent, Newsweek and so on brainwashed me to hate Saddam Hussein and support people like Ahmed Chalabi in killing Saddam Hussein for his crimes with the help of Munafiqs. What was the result? Ya Rabbi, it is far beyond any reader’s imagination how much I sobbed, regretted spending sleepless nights and I was devastated to see the Iraqi nation raped and ruptured by foreign forces and millions losing their lives. And then I realised my stupidity in supporting American actions in regime change and the Muslim media’s flaws. How the people of Iraq could have been saved if only Saddam had been in power, in spite of his weaknesses.



By Mohamed Ameen on Joshua Landis on Syrian Uprising, 4/30/2011 Posted... on 5/1/11


Thursday, May 26, 2011

Yahoo Qustions and Answers


What Exactly Is The Israelie-Palestinian Conflict About?


I'm considered to be a student of history and I know for a fact that the land of Israel which is really just the land of Judea belongs to the Hebrew people (the Jews), historically speaking. As a Christian who thanks the early followers of Y'Shua the Messiah for preaching the gospel to other nations, who were Jewish, I'm sort of confused on who occupies Israel at the moment since 1948. Is the majority of Israel occupied by a Jewish sect or Jewish people in general? Aren't the Palestinians technically Arabs? Wouldn't their ancestry have come from the Arabic Peninsula? Last time I checked Judea/Israel isn't part of this peninsula which brings in another question, didn't the Muslims in the middle ages take this land by force? Everyone WITH intelligence knows Islam was always a geopolitical movement. What's with the Jewish hate amongst those radical Muslims? Didn't those protesters get influenced by a terrorist organization named HAMAS?


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker


It seems you've got your information mixed up. The Palestinians are the descendants of the Canaanites and the Israelites (who were essentially a sub-branch of the Canaanites). The Canaanites predate Judaism by thousands of years (as state in your bible) itself. However, in the last 2000 years many other civilizations have conquered Palestine and some of them settled there, such as the Romans, Byzantines, Persians, Arab Muslims from the Arabian Peninsula, Crusaders, Mamluks and Ottomans.

Those people have changed their religion over time. Judaism was widely spread in Palestine early on. However, during Byzantine times most residents of Palestine converted to Christianity. During Arab Muslim rule, most converted to Islam. However significant Jewish and Christian minorities remained. This mixture of people made up the Palestinians of today. Thus most of the Jews that you refer to who lived in Palestine 2000 years ago have converted to Christianity and Islam and are part of the Palestinian people today.

Most of the Jews occupying Palestine today are not native to the land, but in reality immigrants from all over the world. nearly half come from European origin who are totally foreign to the whole region and not just Palestine.


Asker's Rating: Asker's Comment: Thank you for your information. In a way President Obama made a good decision about the borders and how the Jews who live there today should sort of give up the land. I guess its all about compromise to bring peace though.


It boils down to two things. 1) Hamas doesn't recognize Israel's right to exist as a nation and will all die before they change their beliefs. 2) The Palestinians refuse to give up The Dome of The Rock which is built upon the past site of the Jewish Temple and where they made sacrifices to God. Those two simple, yet positively impossible to change facts, are the reasons that the world will end starting in Jerusalem.


People called Arabs are really people who have Arab as their mother tongue. The people called Palestinians are descendants of various groups of people that have at some time or another settled in the area. That is, the Palestinians of course also have some Jewish ancestors. Of course, they also have ancestors from the Arab peninsula, probably also some European Christian crusaders from the middle ages. By the way, not all Palestinians are Muslims, some are for instance Christians. Before the establishment of the state of Israel, the Jews who had been living there had up to this point been considered Palestinians too. Palestine was simply a geographic label for this areas. After Israel was established, the Palestinians Jews identified as Israelis and "Palestinian"became a label for the remaining, largely (but not exclusively) Muslim population.


So what is it about? It is clearly about land. Land which is considered as "holy" by three different religions.

Alan Dershowitz Critiques Obama Mideast Speech

Breaking from Newsmax.com
Obama Explains His Mideast Speech — and Makes It Worse
By Alan Dershowitz


In his press conference with Prime Minister David Cameron in London on Wednesday, President Barack Obama explained his thinking as to why he insisted that the first step in seeking a peaceful two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians must be an agreement by Israel to accept the 1967 borders with mutually agreed-upon land swaps. Here is what he said:


"It is going to require wrenching compromise from both sides. In the last decade, when negotiators have talked about how to achieve that outcome, there have been typically four issues that have been raised. One is the issue of what would the territorial boundaries of a new Palestinian state look like.


"Number two: How could Israel feel confident that its security needs would be met? Number three: how would the issue of Palestinian refugees be resolved; and number four, the issue of Jerusalem.


"The last two questions are extraordinarily emotional. They go deep into how the Palestinians and the Jewish people think about their own identities. Ultimately they are going to be resolved by the two parties. I believe that those two issues can be resolved if there is the prospect and the promise that we can actually get to a Palestinian state and a secure Jewish state of Israel."


This recent statement clearly reveals the underlying flaw in Obama’s thinking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. There is no way that Israel can agree to borders without the Palestinians also agreeing to give up any claim to a “right of return.”


As Palestinian Prime Minister Fayyad Salaam once told me: each side has a major card to play and a major compromise to make; for Israel, that card is the West Bank, and the compromise is returning to the 1967 lines with agreed-upon adjustments and land swaps; for the Palestinians, that card is “the right of return,” and the compromise is an agreement that the Palestinian refugees will be settled in Palestine and not in Israel; in other words, that there will be no right to “return” to Israel.


President Obama’s formulation requires Israel to give up its card and to make a “wrenching compromise” by dismantling most of the West Bank settlements and ending its occupation of the West Bank. But it does not require the Palestinians to give up their card and to compromise on the right of return. That “extraordinarily emotional” issue is to be left to further negotiations only after the borders have been agreed to.


This temporal ordering — requiring Israel to give up the “territorial” card before the Palestinians even have to negotiate about the “return” card — is a non-starter for Israel and it is more than the Palestinians have privately asked for. Once again, President Obama, by giving the Palestinians more than they asked for, has made it difficult, if not impossible, for the Palestinians to compromise.


Earlier in his administration, Obama insisted that Israel freeze all settlement building, despite the fact that the Palestinians had not demanded such action as a precondition to negotiating. He forced the Palestinians to impose that as a precondition, because no Palestinian leader could be seen as less pro-Palestinian than the American president.


Now he’s done it again, by not demanding that the Palestinians give up their right of return as a quid for Israel’s quo of returning to the 1967 borders with agreed-upon land swaps.


So it’s not so much what President Obama said; it’s what he didn’t say. It would have been so easy for the president to have made the following statement:


"I am asking each side to make a wrenching compromise that will be extraordinarily emotional and difficult. For Israel, this compromise must take the form of abandonment of its historic and Biblical claims to what it calls Judea and Samaria. This territorial compromise will require secure boundaries somewhat different than the 1967 lines that led to war. Resolution 242 of the Security Council recognized the need for changes in the 1967 lines that will assure Israel’s security. Since 1967, demographic changes have occurred that will also require agreed-upon land swaps between Israel and the new Palestinian state. This territorial compromise will be difficult for Israel, but in the end it will be worthwhile, because it will assure that Israel will remain both a Jewish and a fully democratic state in which every resident is equal under the law.


"For the Palestinians, this compromise must take the form of a recognition that for Israel to continue to be the democratic state of the Jewish people, the Palestinian refugees and their descendants will have to be settled in Palestine. In other words, they will have a right to return, but to Palestine and not to Israel. This will be good both for Palestine and for Israel. For Palestine, it will assure that the new state will have the benefit of a large and productive influx of Palestinians from around the world. This Palestinian diaspora should want to help build an economically and politically viable Palestinian state. The Palestinian leadership must recognize, as I believe they do, that there will be no “right of return” of millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to Israel. Compensation can be negotiated both for those Palestinians who left Israel as a result of the 1948 wars and for those Jews who left Arab countries during and after that same period."


It’s not too late for President Obama to “explain” that that is what he really meant when he declared that Israel must remain a Jewish state and that any Palestinian government that expects compromises from Israel must recognize that reality.


Central to Israel’s continued existence as the nation-state of the Jewish people is the Palestinian recognition that there can be no so-called “right of return” to Israel, and that the Palestinian leadership and people must acknowledge that Israel will continue to exist as the nation-state of the Jewish people within secure and recognized boundaries.


Unless President Obama sends that clear message, not only to the Israelis but to the Palestinians as well, he will not move the peace process forward. He will move it backward.
© Newsmax. All rights reserved.
This e-mail was sent by:
Newsmax.com
4152 West Blue Heron Blvd., Ste. 1114
Riviera Beach, FL 33404 USA





Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Defense Cuts After Osama's Death?

Will there be an Osama 'peace dividend'?
msnbc.com msnbc.com
updated 5/3/2011 With Osama bin Laden dead, can America go back to the days before terrorism and the big defense costs that came with it?


The Sept. 11, 2001 attack on the United States took place near the end of a fiscal year in which the federal government ran a budget surplus of $127 billion. Military spending that year amounted to $291 billion, or about 15 percent of total spending.


But the attack sent military budgets soaring. Defense outlays since 9/11 have increased, on average, by nearly 7 percent a year in inflation-adjusted terms. Military spending this year will be about $700 billion, nearly two-and-a-half times the level in 2001, and nearly 20 percent of total federal spending.


The new billions being pumped into defense, along with other factors, helped change the budget surplus of 2001 into the deficits that followed. This year's deficit will be close to $1.5 trillion, nearly 10 percent of gross domestic product, adding to growing fears of a debt crisis.


If operations in Afghanistan and Iraq came to an end, total defense outlays would be reduced by roughly one fifth.


Of course the Pentagon would still be spending hundreds of billions of dollars on pay and benefits for the troops, operations and maintenance, new weapons purchases, military construction, and housing for military families. The United States, for example, still keeps nearly 80,000 military personnel in Europe and 35,000 in Japan.

Room to cut spending?

As members of Congress return from recess this week to intensify their debate over the deficit and the debt, Osama bin Laden's death focuses attention on military spending and specifically on the $110 billion-a-year U.S. commitment in Afghanistan.

Until now, cuts in defense spending haven't played a dominant role in the budget debate. But if U.S. troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan — which President Barack Obama says he wants to begin doing by July 1 — and if voters don't see the need for continued outlays at post-9/11 levels, it could transform the budget debate.


Smaller military outlays might reduce the need for big cuts elsewhere in politically risky budget items like Medicare spending.
In his fiscal year 2012 budget proposal, Obama has already called for discretionary military spending (that is, not including spending on military retirement benefits) to be cut by 5 percent.

Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations who served as a top State Department official in the Bush administration, said Monday that bin Laden's death "raises questions about our strategy in Afghanistan."


The successful raid "shows the continued promise of tactical counter-terrorism operations," he said, it also "reinforces also the question of whether the course we're on — which has a large element of nation-building and capacity-building and counterinsurgency within Afghanistan — can succeed, given the willingness of Pakistan to provide sanctuary for at least the Afghan Taliban, not to mention others."
Successful tactical counterterrorism — done in Navy SEAL operations or drone attacks from Yemen to Pakistan — might not require 100,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

Gideon Rose, the editor of Foreign Affairs magazine and a former National Security Council official in the Clinton administration, said bin Laden's killing "might open space for the Obama administration to ease its way out of Afghanistan, if it so chooses, not because the threat will be dramatically less, but because they'll be able to (in the phrase attributed to Sen. George Aiken about the Vietnam War) 'declare victory and go home' — if they want to. We'll see whether they want to."


Lawmakers are divided about what bin Laden's death could — or should — mean for troop levels in Afghanistan.


In a campaign email, Rep. Chellie Pingree, D-Maine, urged her supporters to sign a petition to "send a strong message (to Obama) that people in Maine and around the country want the decade-long war to end, want our troops out of harm's way, and want to focus on the many pressing issues facing us here at home."


But a counsel of caution came from one of the Senate's hawks, Sen. Joe Lieberman, I – Conn., who told reporters Monday, "I've already heard a few calls that we quickly withdraw from Afghanistan because 'the war is over,' because bin Laden is dead. I wish we could say that."


But, he warned, "if we did that, we would repeat a mistake that we made once before when we pulled out of Afghanistan and that region after the Soviets did and that invited the Taliban and al Qaida into Afghanistan, and from Afghanistan they attacked us on 9/11."


Going after waste — and much more


Asked about military spending in the wake of the bin Laden killing, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday that senators on the Armed Services and Appropriations Committees are "looking for any waste in the Pentagon. Secretary Gates is doing the same thing."


But there's far more at stake than waste. Despite battles with members of Congress and lobbyists over individual items such as an extra engine for the F–35 fighter, Gates is mostly trying to squeeze savings out of the Pentagon as a private-sector CEO would with an overgrown corporation: by shrinking headcount and cutting health care costs.


And, even when it comes to defense costs that would seem to be focused on guns and steel, it turns out that there's no escaping from the health care debate.


As Gates told the Senate earlier this year, "Sharply rising health care costs are consuming an ever-larger share of this Department's budget," growing from $19 billion in 2001 to $52.5 billion in the budget request for fiscal year 2012.


He has proposed what he calls "modest increases" to the fee charged for enrolling in TRICARE, the health care plan which covers uniformed service members, retirees and their families.


He said the Pentagon's current health care plan, "one in which fees have not increased for 15 years, is simply unsustainable, and if allowed to continue, the Defense Department risks the fate of other corporate and government bureaucracies that were ultimately crippled by personnel costs, in particular, their retiree benefit packages."


A shrinking military


Gates's cost-cutting also hinges on shrinking headcount.


In a speech at West Point last February, he argued that "the most plausible, high-end scenarios for the U.S. military are primarily naval and air engagements" and that "the prospects for another head-on clash of large mechanized land armies seem less likely."


When Gates first took office in 2006, in order to "relieve the severe stress on the force from the Iraq war as the surge was getting underway" he expanded the Army by 65,000 to a total of 547,000 and the Marine Corps by 27,000 to 202,000. He later added 22,000 more to the Army.


But, starting in 2014, Gates proposes that the military begin reducing the active duty Army by 27,000 and the Marine Corps by between 15,000 and 20,000.


He won't be around to carry out these plans: it will be up to his designated successor, Leon Panetta, or whoever might follow him, to do that.


Despite the cuts, this won't be a "peace dividend" of the magnitude of the 1990s.


During the Cold War, from 1947 to 1990, defense spending accounted for 40 percent of all federal spending. In President John F. Kennedy's first year in office, over half of all federal spending went to defense. By President Ronald Reagan’s final year in office, defense spending had dropped to 27.3 percent of federal outlays and by 1999, it had shrunk to 16 percent.


Measured as a percentage of gross domestic product, defense outlays shrank by more than a third between JFK and the end of Bill Clinton's presidency, going from 9.4 percent of GDP to only 3 percent of GDP. They now stand at about 5 percent of GDP.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Osama bin Laden Killed in Firefight With Navy Seals and CIA Paramilitary Forces

NBC News and msnbc.com

updated 24 minutes ago 2011-05-02T07:33:50
Osama bin Laden, the glowering mastermind behind the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks that killed thousands of Americans, was slain in his luxury hideout in Pakistan early Monday in a firefight with U.S. forces, ending a manhunt that spanned a frustrating decade.
.."Justice has been done," President Barack Obama declared as crowds formed outside the White House to celebrate, singing "The Star-Spangled Banner" and "We Are the Champions," NBC News reported.
Hundreds more sang and waved American flags at Ground Zero in New York — where the twin towers that once stood as symbols of American economic power were brought down by bin Laden's hijackers 10 years ago.


Bin Laden, 54, was killed after a firefight with Navy SEALs and CIA paramilitary forces at a compound in the city of Abbottabad. He was shot in the head, NBC News reported.
A U.S. official told NBC News that bin Laden was later buried at sea "in accordance with Islamic law and tradition."


Other U.S. officials said one of bin Laden's sons and two of his most trusted couriers also were killed, as was an unidentified woman who was used as a human shield.
Al Arabiya reported that two of bin Laden's wives and four of his children were also captured during the operation.


Bin Laden was holed up in a two-story house 100 yards from a Pakistani military academy when four helicopters carrying U.S. forces swooped in, leaving his final hiding place in flames, Pakistani officials and a witness said.

They said bin Laden's guards opened fire from the roof of the compound and one of the choppers crashed. However U.S. officials said no Americans were hurt in the operation. The sound of at least two explosions rocked Abbottabad as the fighting raged.


Abbottabad is home to three Pakistan army regiments and thousands of military personnel and is dotted with military buildings. The discovery that bin Laden's was living in an army town in Pakistan raises pointed questions about how he managed to evade capture and even whether Pakistan's military and intelligence leadership knew of his whereabouts and sheltered him.


The news of bin Laden's death immediately raised concerns that reprisal attacks from al-Qaida and other Islamist extremist groups could follow soon.
"In the wake of this operation, there may be a heightened threat to the U.S. homeland," a U.S. official said. "The U.S. is taking every possible precaution. The State Department has sent advisories to embassies worldwide and has issued a travel ban for Pakistan."


Police in New York, site of the deadliest attack on Sept. 11, said they had already begun to "ramp up" security on their own.


Charles Wolf of New York, whose wife, Katherine, died on Sept, 11, 2001, rejoiced at the news, which he called "wonderful."
"I am really glad that man's evil is off this earth forever," Wolf said. "I am just very glad that they got him."
Former President George W. Bush said in a statement that he had personally been informed by Obama of the death of the terrorist leader whose attacks forever defined his eight years in office.

Death of Osama bin Laden Updated 22 minutes ago 5/2/2011 7:33:50 AM +00:00 US forces kill Osama bin Laden in Pakistan
Updated 32 minutes ago 5/2/2011 7:24:35 AM +00:00 US tracked couriers to elaborate bin Laden compound


NYT: Bin Laden, the most wanted face of terrorism


Updated 7 minutes ago 5/2/2011 7:49:16 AM +00:00 For 9/11 families, 'no such thing as closure'


Kin of 9/11 victim: 'Justice,' but 'more work to do'
Bin Laden: Alleged mastermind of global attacks
Updated 7 minutes ago 5/2/2011 7:49:11 AM +00:00 Bush, victims react to bin Laden's death


.."This momentous achievement marks a victory for America, for people who seek peace around the world, and for all those who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001," the former president said.


"The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done."
Obama echoed his predecessor, declaring that "the death of bin Laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation's struggle to defeat al-Qaida."
But he stressed that the effort against the organization continues. Al-Qaida remains in existence as an organization, presumably under the leadership of Ayman al-Zawahiri, 59, an Egyptian physician who is widely believed to have been bin Laden's No. 2.
"We must and we will remain vigilant at home and abroad," he said, while emphasizing that "the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam."






Officials had long believed that bin Laden was hiding a mountainous region along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. In August, U.S. intelligence officials got a tip on his whereabouts, which led to the operation that culminated Sunday, Obama said.




U.S. officials told NBC News that CIA paramilitary forces and Navy SEAL Team Six carried out the attack on the al-Qaida compound.

The special operations forces returned with the body to Afghanistan, U.S. officials said.


One U.S. helicopter was damaged and was destroyed at the scene to protect its intelligence. All U.S. personnel got out safely, U.S. officials said.


The role of Pakistan, with which Washington has had a difficult relationship for years, remained unclear. A senior Pakistani intelligence official told NBC News that Pakistani special forces took part in the operation, but senior U.S. and Pakistani officials said Pakistan was not informed of the attack in advance.


Critics have long accused elements of Pakistan's security establishment of protecting bin Laden, though Islamabad has always denied this.


A senior adviser to Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari told NBC News that the politician was expected to make an "extremely positive" statement later Monday because bin Laden was "an enemy of the Pakistani people."
"The bottom line of our collection and analysis was that we had high confidence that the compound held a high-value terrorist target," a senior official said, with a "strong probability" that it was bin Laden.


Bin Laden's compound was huge and "extraordinarily unique," about eight times larger than other homes in the area, U.S. officials said.


They said the compound was isolated by 12-foot walls, with access restricted to two security gates. It had no telephone or Internet service and had clearly been custom built to hide "someone of significance."


Story: For 9/11 families, 'There's no such thing as closure' 'I'm completely numb'


Reaction to the news of bin Laden's death was swift.


Bonnie McEneaney, 57, whose husband, Eamon, died in the 9/11 attacks, said the death of bin Laden was "long overdue."


"It doesn't bring back all the wonderful people who were killed 10 years ago," McEneaney told msnbc.com by phone from her home in New Canaan, Conn.


"I'm completely numb. I'm stunned," she said.


"The first thought I had in my mind was that it didn't bring my son back," Jack Lynch, who lost his son, New York City firefighter Michael Francis Lynch, on Sept. 11, 2001, told msnbc.com.


"You cut the head off a snake, you'd think it would kill the snake. But someone will take his place," Lynch said. "But people like him still exist. The fact that he's gone is not going to stop terrorism."


Video: 8 month lead up to bin Laden’s death (on this page) Lynch, 75, is a retired transit worker. His family's charity, the Michael Lynch Memorial Foundation, has made grants to send dozens of students to college. He said he would not celebrate bin Laden's death.


"I understand that bin Laden was an evil person. He may have believed in what he was doing. I'm not going to judge him," Lynch said. "I'm sure some people will look at this and they'll be gratified that he's dead, but me personally, I'm going to leave his fate in God's hands."




Reaction from U.S. officials who have been entrenched in the battle against al-Qaida for years were more jubilant.


2012 presidential candidates react


Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Obama's opponent in the 2008 election, said he was "overjoyed that we finally got the world's top terrorist."


"The world is a better and more just place now that Osama bin Laden is no longer in it," McCain said in a statement. "I hope the families of the victims of the September 11th attacks will sleep easier tonight and every night hence knowing that justice has been done."


Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, said that "today, the American people have seen justice."


"In 2001, President Bush said 'we will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.' President Bush deserves great credit for putting action behind those words," King said in a statement. "President Obama deserves equal credit for his resolve in this long war against al-Qaida."


Al-Qaida has bedeviled U.S. presidents going back to the Clinton administration. Besides the Sept. 11 attacks, the organization also claimed responsibility bombing two U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998, killing 231 people, as well as a maritime attack on the USS Cole in 2000 off the coast of Yemen, which killed 17 U.S. sailors.


Msnbc.com staff, NBC News, WNBC, The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.


.

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Joshua Landis on Syrian Uprising, 4/30/2011 Posted and edited by Dr. Jordan Richman

CREATIVE SYRIA
Joshua Landis


News from Aleppo, Homs, and Hama


Friday, April 29th, 2011


I am dismayed by the analysis provided by the anonymous retired diplomat. Below is my response to his argument that only 2% are involved in the protests. By examining many youtube videos of the Syrian protesters, one will conclude the following

1. Most protesters are aged between 18-40 2. 95% of protesters are men.


For the total number of protesters, I am going to use the same estimate provided by the anonymous retired diplomat, i.e. 400,000 protesters. ·

We can safely assume that for each male protester, a female relative of the same age group (wife, sister…) stayed home yet shared the same sentiment of her male relative ( I am going to call them passive female protesters). This makes the number of protesters (active & passive) 780,000.


It's probably safe to assume that the age group (18-40) constitute 35% of the population. This brings the total number of ( Active protesters + Passive-female protesters +their extended families) to 2,250,000… ·

Given the tremendous risk of being shot dead during demonstrations. It is safe to assume that only ?% of the disgruntled population would actually go out and protest. I will estimate that only 3 out of each 10 disgruntled male citizens came out to the streets. This brings the total number of Active protesters + Passive-female protesters +their extended families+ scared-to-protest to 7,500,000.


Most protesters are sunni Muslims. Sunni Muslims are 70% of the population, this comes to be 16, 310,000. This means that 46% of sunnis are involved in the protests (active, passive, and scared)

Some people have been inflating the population of Damascus, it is only 1.64 millions. ( see tables) · Aleppo and Damascus (total of 4 millions inhabitants) have not yet participated in the demonstrations.

Population Under 15 years of age** 40%


Population over 65 years of Age** 3.30%


Popoulation between 15 & 65** 56.70%


A Syrian friend writes:


I have developed the utmost respect to the “original” Syrian opposition. People like Michel Kilo, Bassam Alkadi and a long list of others who have been imprisoned for years because they demanded reforms in Syria are now the only sane voices out there requesting calm. If the regime survives it should replace Hafez and Basel’s statues that were torn down around the country with statues for people like Kilo and AlKadi. They are investing all the credibility they have accumulated over the years to keep the country out of civil war. Watch this interview in Arabic.Aleppo: Fadi writes about why Aleppo has been quite:

I think you have to add to it that Aleppo (like Damascus) has witnessed more openness during the last few years. Aleppo benefited the most from the openness with Turkey, both economically and culturally. It was a real window for breathing. The sectarian and religious tensions that exist in places like Banias and Latakia does not exist in Aleppo. Also, Bashar personally is very much liked in Aleppo. He roams the souks when there. Over the past years he developed a habit of staying in Aleppo frequently and meets with locals. He smartly had a hands on dealing with Aleppo.


These are all personal observations.


Aleppo by Karim:


There were several small protests around Aleppo in the last 10 days. These protests were allowed to proceed by security forces without interference. However, every single time, after 15 minutes or less from startup, a group of civilians would arrive in trucks and buses outnumbering the demonstrators by around 5 times. This new group would start shouting pro regime slogans and would engage the original demonstrators brutally. The Security forces would eventually interfere taking the anti-regime demonstrators to the security stations for questioning. After 2 days or so of questioning most of them are released.


Rumors have it that these people are thugs brought up to deal with the demonstrators. No such thugs were captured so no one can confirm these rumors. Such stories are the main source of fear holding pro-reform demonstrators from gathering larger numbers.


On another note, Syrians have really outgrown sectarian ideas in the last 5-6 years. You have not been living here during this time and it is remarkable how much Syrians have become mature with regard to sectarianism. I have become very proud of the average Aleppean refusal to see things from this narrow angle. The people have grown in an impressive way.


Aleppo: Another person


Hope things are well; just wanted to say I fully concur with Karim’s recent comment on your facebook post, both regarding the small demonstrations in Aleppo and the surprisingly mature attitudes with regards to sectarianism here in the last years.


Two nights ago according to some friends there was another small demonstration right in Aziziye, a very central Christian/mixed upper middle class shopping district here in Aleppo, so not somewhere off in the ‘burbs like in Douma or Telbiseh. There again they brought in party goons in greater numbers to shout down and begin beating up demonstrators.


Aleppo continues to be calm, and there is a apparently a large pro-regime demonstration, yawm Bashar or something, being organized Friday tomorrow. People in the rest of the country are beginning to make jokes about Aleppo’s lack of action; a friend of a friend was reportedly offered by a business contact from out of town to send him diapers, since Aleppines are so scared of demonstrating; someone else reported that some Aleppines travelling to Latakia were suddenly told there was no more room at the hotel when asked where they were from.


Regardless of whether it’s factually true or not, it does say something about the perception/self-perception of the people of Aleppo in the current situation. The people we talk with remain overwhelmingly dismissive of the protest movement; my taxi driver yesterday was the first to evoke the crackdown of 1980 (2000 dead, HRW figure).


Many foreigners have now left Aleppo, as their embassies or more specifically the governmental aid organizations they work for (and that is a high proportion of the foreigners who wind up in Aleppo) order them to leave by this Friday. Some have indicated how difficult it is to uproot their entire family, pull the kids out of school and pack on three days’ notice, but they are threatened with being fired and worse if they do not comply. Needless to say it’s not all countries who are doing this; it’s sanctions before the letter on the part of some. And now the IISA International School (international in name and cost only; its academic standards and administrative practice are anything but) is taking license to simply stop functioning 2 1/2 weeks earlier this spring. Small problems compared to elsewhere in the country, of course, but just goes to show that some foreign institutions, much like parts of the media, are positively anticipating the souring of the mood here.


Louai:

‘More than 230 ruling Baath members resign in Syria’ if Syria get back in its feet soon ,and it will . those people will be regretting; reason is they are gambling that the Baath party is finishing soon however its not. This kind of people who resign and acuse the government of all the killing where more that 60 police officers and military men died whilst this ‘peaceful ‘demonstrators are demonstrating. Wouldn’t you ask your self how all those people died? who shoot at them if its only a peaceful demonstrations?


I am a member of the Baath Party and as many others I have joined the party to get some privilege (was too young that time and I thought every one is in the party whilst they are 18 any way) but the party has nothing to do with all what is happening; its the state fighting against terrorism.


George:


No question that the big cities have'nt seen more of the economic cake than the smaller towns and villages. In that sense, economics again is the main factor. Outside of aleppo and damascus it has an absolute disaster when it comes to an economic trickle down. In his opinion, Aleppo had suffered greatly during the MB uprising. The people of Aleppo went through hell during that period. They have no appetite for an encore.


Homs: From [A person from Homs]


I also talked to many of my relatives from Homs. The people I talked to are all liberal and open minded. The amount of anger in Homs against the regime is massive. Really massive. There are many low life, regime crony, Alawites in Homs that ran havoc in the city – including Bashar’s personal friend, the deposed Governor. A certified crook whose abuses have reached the ears of everyone. Yet Bashar stuck to him.

Then there is the First Lady’s family, who built for themselves another Makhloof empire.

My cousin was telling me how in Homs, and during Ramadan, you go to get a piece of paper from the Amn, and they all [being Alawites] are smoking and drinking tea , to make sure they annoy the public.

To say that the resentment for the regime in Homs is huge is an understatement. I don’t like the Islamists one bit, but I can only blame the regime for getting us here from there.

Also related to Homs and its anger: Guess what the current interior minister used to be? He was the deputy to Ghazi Kanaan in Homs [He graduated from military college in 1965 and rose to become head of intelligence for the central region. ] They both ran Homs as their own farm. Homsis have legends about their abuses during the old days when Kanaan was the head of intelligence in Homs and how the current interior minister, a certified thug and a rapist, did not spare a living soul from abuse.

And when Kanaan was given Lebanon to run [between 1982 and 2002 he headed the security and intelligence branch in Beirut], his deputy, ran amok even more. So for Bashar to appoint him as the Minister of Interior was a slap in the face. How much more stupid can the regime get? I dunno.


But I still cannot fathom the ideas of religious Homsis taking over anything. They need to be crushed. They are as criminal.


Hama
On our last evening in Hama some people warned us, right in the tourist district, to take the kids indoors and consider leaving town because a demonstration was happening near the citadel and would lead to trouble. We had actually just been at the citadel and hadn’t seen anything, so it can’t have been huge, but upon returning to the main square with the clock tower we saw several unmarked buses with guys in civil clothes and one clearly carrying a stick. I don’t think much actually happened that night, though the streets downtown were unusually empty (I moved our car into a back alley just to be safe!), but this seems to be a pattern which is being repeated in several cities. Come to think of it, the people (unusually suspicious and unfriendly) we had met in some Alawi villages around Masyaf that day had been talking in the same terms, that we should leave Hama and go back to Damascus. Maybe they already knew where they would be on duty that night…?
just to keep you updated, is my last friday here: Things are extremly calm, though today for the first time people from the old mosque in the Christian quarter (I forgot the name, it is next to the monastery) walked into the city and shouted: Brh, Bdam, Nadfik ja Deraa. I cannot verify the number, but from the shouts it could not have been much more than 40-50.

Since 4 p.m. traffic is normal in town, so there seems to be no “Hama is joining the protest”, otherwise things would have been different. Last friday we felt some tension in the city, but this friday life is back to normal, I might be wrong and missed some events, thus will try to get some more information and let you know.


Today I was really shocked by the German news which describe Syria to be in a state of complete war, with refugees, millions of demonstrators (I hate the sentence “non-confirmed information by eyewitness” or “cannot be verified”, I mean, guys, if you cannot verify information, do not publish them).

Am I living in a Syrian oasis? I really have a good time in Hama, Hama in spring is beautiful and green, people play backgammon in the parks (and at the same time AlJazeera reports protests and killings in Hama, how ridicoulous!), I do not have the feeling things are worsening at all. On the contrary, as shop owners loose income through protests (The traffic between Hama and Homs is limited and customers do not buy as before the crisis), people just want the protests to stop.


What are the ground comments you get from other towns?


رابطة العلماء السوريين حول بيان وزارة الأوقاف السورية
في رده على الاتحاد العالمي لعلماء المسلمين ونصرته للانتفاضة السورية
1- مطالب المتظاهرين السلميين في سوريا شرعية، ومساندتهم واجب شرعي على كلّ عالمٍ مسلم، أيًّا كانت جنسيته، فالقيم وواجبات الدين منظومة واحدة، والعلم رَحِم بين أهله، فلا يجوز التقوُّل على الدين وباسمه، كما لا يجوز ترديد مثل تلك الأوهام التي يعتاش عليها بعض السياسيين من قبيل تهمة “التدخل في الشؤون الداخلية”، ونربأ بعلمائنا أن يكرروا مثل تلك المقولات التي لا تتفق مع تخصصهم وما أمرهم الله به من بيان الحق والصدع به






2- ما قام به الاتحاد العالمي ورئيسه العلامة يوسف القرضاوي هو قيامٌ بالواجب الشرعيّ في نُصرة المستضعفين، وخذلان الباطل، كما أنه قيام بواجب الحق والعدل، وليس تدخلا في شأن خاصّ بقطر أو إقليم، لأن القيم الإسلامية والإنسانية لا تعترف بحدود جغرافية مصطنعة، كما أن التكليف الشرعيّ للمسلمين عامة والعلماء خاصة لا ينحصر في إطار جغرافي مهما تعددت التسميات.


Posted by Joshua at 2:16 pm
Permalink
Print
162 comments


Categories: uprising Translate: ES
FR
العربيه






Email this




Share on Facebook “Crunch Time for the Syrian Regime” by Peter Harling


Friday, April 29th, 2011


A Friend writes:


I think they are ready for the national dialogue now. I was watching Syrian TV minutes ago and 2 MP said the following:


MP Mohammad Habash: “The era of the mukhabarat in Syria is OVER. I know that they don’t like me saying this but I don’t care”


MP Ghaboush: “I call for a national dialogue. It should start immediately”
Again this was on State TV!!
Crunch Time for the Syrian Regime


Peter Harling in Foreign Policy


Seen from Damascus, the crisis that is gripping Syria is fast approaching crunch-time. The regime appears to have stopped pretending it can offer a way out. More than ever, it portrays the confrontation as a war waged against a multifaceted foreign enemy which it blames for all casualties. This narrative, which informs the security services’ brutal response to protests, has cost the authorities the decisive battle for perceptions abroad, at home, and even in central Damascus — a rare bubble of relative calm that has now entered into a state of utter confusion.


The primary benefit of observing events from the Syrian capital is to measure just how unreliable all sources of information have become. Local media tell a tale of accusations and denials in which, incredibly, security services are the sole victims, persecuted by armed gangs. Where the regime initially acknowledged civilian martyrs and sought to differentiate between legitimate grievances and what it characterized as sedition, such efforts have come to an end.

For its part, the foreign media, denied access by the regime, relies virtually exclusively on material produced by on-the-ground protesters, the dependability of which has proven uneven. The novel phenomenon of “eye-witnesses” further blurs the picture. Outside observers have sought to counter the state-imposed blackout by recruiting correspondents, often haphazardly, flooding the country with satellite phones and modems. Several cases of false testimonies have cast doubts on such procedures but, for lack of an alternative, they largely continue to shape coverage of events.

Under the circumstances, Damascenes have but one option: to work the phones, calling relatives, friends, and colleagues throughout the country in a desperate attempt to form their own opinion. They hear and tell stories that are self-contradictory. Some tend to confirm the existence of armed agents provocateurs; many others credibly blame the regime for the bulk of the violence. Instances of sectarian polarization surface in some areas, while examples of cross-community solidarity burgeon in others. Neighbors often provide inconsistent accounts while people who share socio-economic backgrounds react to similar events in contrasting ways.

Such chaos is inherent in times of crisis, but it also is a reflection of the profound mistrust between citizens and their state, which has failed to offer any point of reference around which undecided Syrians could rally. To the contrary: the regime has systematically fostered a sense of bewilderment and anxiety. Most damaging of all has been the constant contradiction between its words and deeds.

Regime assertions notwithstanding, evidence regarding excessive use of force by security forces in circumstances that cannot plausibly be described as representing an immediate threat is piling up. Given the extraordinary deployment of forces and security lockdown in and around the capital last weekend, it is simply impossible to imagine that so-called agitators could be behind the bloodshed. Even where the regime’s responsibility in both the onset and escalation of confrontation is beyond doubt, as in the southern city of Deraa, the regime feels the need to undertake an endless “investigation” before holding anyone accountable, even as arbitrary arrests remain the norm when dealing with protesters.

On the political front, the regime has lifted the emergency law but allows security services to conduct business as usual, illustrating how irrelevant the concept of legality was in the first place. It authorizes demonstrations while stating they are no longer needed and labeling them as seditious. It speaks of reforming the media and, in the same breath, fires an oh-so-loyal editor-in-chief for straying from the official line. It insists on ignoring the most outrageous symbols of corruption. It promises a multi-party law even as it proves how little power is vested in civilian institutions. Finally, and although it has engaged in numerous bilateral talks with local representatives, it resists convening a national dialogue, which might offer a slim chance of finding an inclusive and credible way forward.


In more parts of the country than one can count, protesters now face only the most brutal, repressive side of the regime. For those who mourn the dead and know them not as saboteurs and traitors, but as relatives, neighbors, and friends, there is nothing left to discuss. Slowly but surely, these ink spots of radicalized opposition are spreading and joining in an increasingly determined and coordinated movement to topple the regime.


Many Syrians — even among those without sympathy for the regime — still resist this conclusion. Their arguments should not be ignored. They dread the breakup of a state whose institutions, including the military, are weak even by regional standards. They fear that sectarian dynamics or a hegemonic religious agenda could take hold. They suspect Syria would cave in to foreign interference. And they distrust an exiled opposition that is all too reminiscent of Iraq’s.

The regime appears to be calculating that the prospect of a bloodbath will prove the strongest argument of all. The scenario is both risky and self-defeating, for if it will be a tragedy for the Syrian people, it will also spell disaster for the regime itself. Instead, it should immediately rein in security services, take decisive action against those responsible for state violence, and initiate a genuine, all-inclusive national dialogue. This could provide an opportunity for representatives of the popular movement to emerge, for their demands to be fleshed out, and for authorities to demonstrate they have more to offer than empty words and certain doom.


Peter Harling is the Iraq-Syria-Lebanon project director with the International Crisis Group


Posted by Joshua at 2:07 pm
Permalink
Print
8 comments


Categories: uprising Translate: ES
FR
العربيه


Email this


Share on Facebook “National Initiative for Change” Program of Syrian Opposition: the liberal wing


Friday, April 29th, 2011


The following is a press release from the liberal wing of the Syrian Opposition. It is notable because it does not include anyone that I know who belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood or Islamic currents of the opposition or speaks for it. Many of the animators of the movement are academics in the US – Najib Ghadbian, a political science professor, and his wife, Mouhja Kahf, a talented poet, both teach at the University of Arkansas.Ammar Kahf, probably a brother, is a grad student at UCLA.

Radwan Ziyadeh is now visiting at George Washington University and was at USIP. Ammar Abdulhamid was visiting at Brookings’ Saban Center. Khawla Yousef, another signer and activist, is his wife.


Ausama Monajed is the head of public relations at the Movement for Justice and Development in London , which has been in the news recently for getting 6 million dollars from the US.


Osama Kadi is co-founder and president of Syrian Center for Political and Strategic Studies SCPSS – a non-profit organization registered in Washington DC.


Their strategy is to ask the Syrian Army to turn against the president, as was the case in Egypt. This is an unlikely scenario because the Syrian Army has remained loyal to the President. The opposition has been claiming that soldiers have been shooting other soldiers for refusing to shoot on protesters. This is not convincing and seems to be the product of wishful thinking. Of course, if the revolution grows in size and force, the Sunni military officers will come under increasing social pressure to resign or defect.


The political reform plan is admirable.


Press Release


National Initiative for Change


Syrian Opposition Demand The Army to Protect Civilians and Facilitate a Transitional Period


Damascus, 29 April 2011
Background

Last Friday, 84 different cities and towns in Syria witnessed massive protests, 400 have been killed since the Syrian revolution started on March 15, with hundreds missing and thousands that have been detained. This popular uprising will lead eventually to the overthrow of the regime. It is imperative that we put an end to the arguments of Syrian exception. Our ultimate dream, as loyal
Syrian nationals, is first to witness our country become one of the best nations in the world. Given that we are witnessing profound “revolutionary” changes not seen in the Arab region since the 1950’s and that we do not want a single drop of blood to be shed by any Syrian, we aspire to learn from other experiences and apply it to our case starting from experiments of transitions to democracies in Western Europe in the 1970’s, Latin American in the 1980’s, Eastern Europe in the 1990’s and what the Arab world is experiencing today as a result of successful popular revolts overthrowing regimes that had been in power for three decades or more.

Situation Now


Syria today only faces two options; either the ruling regime leads itself in a peaceful transition towards democracy –and we are very doubtful to the desire or will of the regime to do so- or it will go through a process of popular protests that will evolve into a massive and grassroots revolution that will breakdown the regime and carry Syria through a period of transition after a wave of violence and instability. Therefore Syria is at a crossroads; the best option is for the leadership of the regime is to lead a transition to democracy that would safeguard the nation from falling into a period of violence, chaos and civil war.

Moving Ahead Syria can accomplish this goal by many means. Political reform should start with re-writing the constitution in a modern democratic fashion that guarantees basic rights to its citizens and emphasizes a system of checks and balances between branches of government. This means a complete separation of the three branches of government: judiciary, executive and legislative. This would also include a radical reform of the judicial system or institutions that have been overcome with corruption and loss of trust by the citizens. This includes the lifting of the state of emergency and all extrajudicial special, martial and field courts -especially the State Security Court-, the release of all political prisoners, the legislation of a modern law governing political parties that would ensure the participation of all Syrians with no exceptions, the reform of media laws and regulations in order to guarantee freedom of the press, the legislation of a new election law, and the forming of a national committee for truth and reconciliation to investigate Syrians who have disappeared and to compensate political prisoners. Above all comes the granting of all political rights to Kurds, the removal of all forms of systemic discrimination practices against them and the prioritizing of eastern provinces in development and infrastructure projects.

The safe transition period in Syria must be based on a firm conviction that the Syrian population completely lost faith in the executive authority, on top of it is the president, his deputies, the prime minister, and the parliament or the People’s Council that has no role in the decision making process and its members are elected with no minimum standards of credibility, transparency and integrity in addition to the election law that regulates the political process rendering it no role in the transition process.


Therefore, the only institution that has the capability to lead the transition period would be the military, and especially the current Minister of Defense General Ali Habib and the Chief of Staff General Dawud Rajha. Both individuals represent a background that Syrians can positively relate with that enables them to take a key pivotal role during the transition process by leading negotiations with civilian representatives from the leadership of the opposition or other respected individuals to form an interim government. By entering the negotiation phase that should take us on a specified timeline to accomplish the democratic transition by first drafting an interim constitution for the country that should be ratified by a national referendum. The transition government will be responsible to monitor the elections and safeguard the successful accomplishment of the transition period beginning with certifying a new constitution drafted by professional constitutional and reform specialists.


Afterwards, the interim government shall issue a new election and political party law to regulate the election process for the president and members of the parliament which is monitored by an independent national committee based on judicial as well as domestic and international observers with an open door policy welcoming the formation of political parties that will participate in the elections.


If the Syrian President does not wish to be recorded in history as a leader of this transition period, there is no alternative left for Syrians except to move forward along the same path as did the Tunisians, Egyptians and Libyans before them.

Signatories inside Syria:


150 politicians, civil society activists and human rights defenders (names are not published for personal safety reasons but will be provided to media).


Signatories outside Syria:


Yahya Mahmoud, Amer Mahdi, Najib Ghadbian, Saleh Moubarak, Ausama Monajed, Obaida Faris, Mohammed Askaf, Ammar Abdulhamid, Mohammed Zuhair Khateeb, Khawla Yousef, Abdulrahman Alhaaj, Douha Nashef, Mahmoud Alsayed Doughaim, Mouhja Kahf, Feras Kassas, Ammar Kahf, Aref Jabo, Mohyeddin Kassar, Abdulbaset Saida, Mazen Hashem, Hassan Jamali, Osama Kadi, Radwan Ziyadeh


Coordinators inside Syria:


Adnan Mahamid: +963 945 988958


Ayman Al-Aswad: +963 988 760302


Coordinators outside Syria:


Radwan Ziadeh: radwan.ziadeh@gmail.com
Ausama Monajed: ausama.monajed@gmail.com
Najib Ghadbian: ghadbian@uark.edu
Posted by Joshua at 11:26 am
Permalink
Print
17 comments
Categories: Opposition Translate: ES
FR
العربيه
Email this
405-819-7955
lmailto:landis@ou.edu
Recent Posts
News from Aleppo, Homs, and Hama
“Crunch Time for the Syrian Regime” by Peter Harling


“National Initiative for Change” Program of Syrian Opposition: the liberal wing


NPR Show with Anthony Shadid, Rami Khouri, and Joshua Landis


News Round Up (28 April 2011)


“Protesters Want Changes to Syria’s Power Structure,” Landis on NPR


Advice For UN from a Retired Diplomat and for Pres. Assad from David Lesch


News Round Up (27 April 2011)


Quelling the Revolt: Will the Opposition Take up Arms?


Deraa Encircled – Major Crack Down in Regime Effort at Shock and Awe – Officers Ordered to Shoot to Kill


Recent Comments


majedkhaldoon: http://all4syria.info/web/arch ives/6331


majedkhaldoon: Seif Al Arab, son of Qaddafi and his three children were killed


ziadsoury: Luoai, I am confused now. Are you a pro-freedom anti-regime or pro-regime and his...


majedkhaldoon: Why Discuss,He said he is objective, this is a joke


ziadsoury: Now they arresting 80+ year olds. They must be the old guards and leaders of the...


majedkhaldoon: Ziadsoury IN USA it is not against the law to treat injured person at home,Norman...


Louai: to ZIADSOURI with recpect as requested here is a link ,i hope its enough ,i have many many...


AIG: It is not the protesters that are blocking the press and objective coverage. It is the...


why-discuss: Ziadsoury “I have yet to see a video of any armed demonstrators alive or...


jad: Sophia, Aljazeera is already doing exactly that with their stories where they take whatever...


View more recent comments ...


Syrian Uprising 2011 From Wikipedia

The 2011 Syrian uprising is a popular uprising taking place in Syria, which began on 26 January 2011. The uprising is influenced by concurrent protests in the region, and has been described as "unprecedented". Like the movements in Tunisia and Egypt, it has mainly, but not exclusively, taken the form of peaceful protests of various types. It can therefore be said to amount to a sustained campaign of civil resistance, also called nonviolent resistance. Such resistance, while seeking to limit the incidence of violence in a conflict, is not based on an assumption that the regime being opposed will necessarily refrain from violence.


In reacting to the largest uprising to take place in the country for decades, Syrian security forces have killed hundreds of protesters, and injured many more. United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has condemned the use of deadly force against protesters as "unacceptable".

President Hafez al-Assad was in office for nearly 30 years; his son, President Bashar al-Assad, succeeded him in 2000.

Former President Hafez al-Assad, and his brother Rifaat al-Assad, personally supervised the Hama massacre. Bashar al-AssadSyria was under an Emergency Law since 1962, effectively suspending most constitutional protections for citizens. Syrian governments justified the state of emergency by pointing to the fact that Syria was in a state of war with Israel. Syrian citizens approve the President in a referendum. Syria does not hold multi-party elections for its legislature.
Since 1963, following the Ba'athist overthrow, Syria has been controlled by the secular Ba'ath Party. Despite internal power changes, such as the 1966 coup and the 1970 Syrian Corrective Revolution, the Ba'ath Party has remained the sole authority in Syria.
After the 1970 Revolution, President Hafez al-Assad led Syria for nearly 30 years, banning any opposing political party and any opposition candidate in any election. In 1982, at the climax of a six-year Islamic insurgency throughout the country, Hafez al-Assad conducted a scorched earth policy against the town of Hama to quell an Islamist revolt by the Sunni Muslim community, including the Muslim Brotherhood and others.Tens of thousands of people, including 10–80,000 civilians, were killed in the Hama massacre.
Hafez al-Assad died in 2000, from pulmonary fibrosis. He was succeeded by his son Bashar al-Assad, who was appointed after a constitutional amendment lowered the age requirement for President from 40 to his age of 34. Bashar, who speaks French and English and has a British-born wife, was said to have "inspired hopes" for reform, and a "Damascus Spring" of intense political and social debate took place from 2000–01.
In 2004, the Al-Qamishli riots against the government erupted in the northeastern city of Al-Qamishli. The riots began during a chaotic soccer match, when some people raised Kurdish flags, and the match turned into a political conflict. In a brutal reaction by Syrian police and clashes between Kurdish and Arab groups, at least 30 people were killed, with some claims indicating a casualty count of about 100 people.
The al-Assad family is a member of the minority and traditionally impoverished Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shiite Islam that numbers an estimated 6-12 percent of the Syrian population and has maintained "a tight grip" on Syria's security services, generating "deep resentment" among the Sunni Muslims that make up about three quarters of Syria's population. Minority Kurds have also protested and complained. Al-Assad declared that his state was immune from the kinds of mass protests that took place in Egypt. Bouthaina Shaaban, a presidential adviser, blamed Sunni clerics and preachers for inciting Sunnis to revolt, such as Qatar-based Sheik Youssef al-Qaradawi in a sermon in Doha on 25 March. According to the New York Times, the Syrian government has relied "almost exclusively" on Alawite-dominated units of the security services to fight the uprising. His younger brother Maher al-Assad, commands the army’s Fourth Armored Division, and a brother-in-law, Assef Shawkat, is an intelligence chief. His family is said to fear that failure to take a hard line on protesters could embolden them, bringing much larger crowds into the streets.
Human rights violations in Syria are largely criticized by global organizations. Since 1963, emergency rule has remained in effect which gives security forces sweeping powers of arrest and detention.The country is governed by a one-party state without free elections.The authorities harass and imprison human rights activist and other critics of the government.Rights of expression, association and assembly are strictly controlled.Women and ethnic minorities face discrimination. According to Human Rights Watch in 2010, al-Assad had failed to improve Syria’s human rights record in the 10 years since he came to power.The organization states that Syria's human rights situation is one of the worst in the world.

2011: While al-Assad permitted radio stations to play Western pop music, websites such as Wikipedia, Youtube, Facebook, and Amazon were blocked until 1 January 2011, when all citizens were permitted to sign up for high speed internet, and those sites were allowed. However, a 2007 law requires Internet cafes to record all comments that users post on online chat forums.
In an interview published 31 January 2011, al-Assad declared it was time to reform, that the protests in Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen indicated a "new era" was coming to the Middle East, and that Arab rulers needed to do more to accommodate their peoples' rising political and economic aspirations.
"Down with al-Assad". Regime-critical graffiti was an early sign of the uprising. The protest movement in Syria was at first modest, and took a while to gain momentum. The events began on 26 January 2011, when Hasan Ali Akleh from Al-Hasakah poured gasoline on himself and set himself on fire, in the same way Tunisian Mohamed Bouazizi had in Tunis on 17 December 2010. According to eyewitnesses, the action was "a protest against the Syrian government".Two days later, on 28 January 2011, an evening demonstration was held in Ar-Raqqah, to protest the killing of two soldiers of Kurdish descent.
On 3 February, a "Day of Rage" was called for in Syria from 4–5 February on social media sites Facebook and Twitter. Protesters demanded governmental reform, but most protests took place outside of Syria, and were small.The only known action within Syria took place on 5 February, when hundreds of protesters in Al-Hasakah participated in a mass demonstration, calling for al-Assad's departure. Syrian authorities arrested dozens, and a demonstration was quickly triggered. After the failure of attempts to arrange a "Day of Rage," Al Jazeera described the country as "a kingdom of silence". It identified the key factors underlying Syrian stability as the country's strict security measures, the popularity of President al-Assad, and fear of potential sectarian violence in the aftermath of a government ouster (akin to neighboring Iraq).
The protest movement was inspired by the situation in Libya, and provoked by alleged ties between the Syrian and Libyan government. The Reform Party of Syria claimed that "al-Assad is sending arms to Gaddafi to kill his people with". On 22 February, about 200 people gathered outside the Libyan embassy in Damascus to protest against the Libyan regime, and ask that the ambassador resign. Government security forces took steps to disperse the demonstration; 14 people were arrested but later released, and several more were beaten by policemen.On 6 March, TIME magazine said that the commitment could still be found among the Syrian youth, but that what was needed was a starting point. Ribal al-Assad said that it was almost time for Syria to be the next domino.
A sign over a burned car says: "Caution! You are in Baniyas, not in Israel". Another says: "Down with the regime".On 15 March, the protest movement began to escalate, as simultaneous demonstrations took place in major cities across Syria. Thousands of protestors gathered in al-Hasakah, Daraa, Deir ez-Zor, and Hama. There were some clashes with security forces, according to reports from dissident groups. In Damascus, a smaller group of 200 men grew spontaneously to about 1,500 men. Damascus has not seen such protests since the 1980s. The official Facebook page called "Syrian Revolution 2011" showed pictures of supportive demonstrations in Cairo, Nicosia, Helsinki, Istanbul and Berlin. There were also unconfirmed news that Syrian revolution supporters of Libyan descent, stormed into the Syrian Embassy in Paris. On 18 March the most serious unrest to take place in Syria for decades erupted. After online calls for a "Friday of Dignity" (Arabic: جمعة الكرامة‎), after Friday prayers, thousands of protesters demanding an end to alleged government corruption took to the streets of cities across Syria.The protesters were met with a violent crackdown orchestrated by state security forces. The protesters chanted "God, Syria, Freedom" and anti-corruption slogans.
Increasingly, the city of Daraa became the focal point for the uprising. On 20 March, thousands took to the streets of Daraa for a third day, shouting slogans against the country's emergency law. One person was killed and scores injured as security forces opened fire on protesters.The courthouse, the Ba'ath party headquarters in the city, and Rami Makhlouf's Syriatel building were all set on fire. The next day, hundreds of people protested in Jassem, and there were also reports of protests in Baniyas, Homs and Hama. Al-Assad made some conciliatory gestures, but crowds continued to gather in and around the Omari mosque in Dara’a, chanting their demands: the release of all political prisoners; trials for those who shot and killed protesters; the abolition of Syria’s 48-year emergency law; more freedoms; and an end to pervasive corruption. Mobile phone connections to Daraa were cut during the day and checkpoints were set up throughout the city and manned by soldiers.
Protesters in Daraa tore down and kicked the statue of Hafez al-Assad, the former president of Syria.
Thousands of demonstrators gathered for Maghrib (Dusk) prayer in New Clock Square in central Homs. On 25 March, after new online calls for a big demonstration called "Friday of Glory" (Arabic: جمعة العزة‎), tens of thousands took to the streets in protests around the nation. Troops opened fire during protests in the southern part of Syria and killed peaceful demonstrators, according to witnesses and news reports. Increasingly, the crackdown against the protests became more violent. There were reports that at least 20 people were killed in protests in Daraa which drew over 100,000 people. A statue of Hafez al-Assad was dismantled and set on fire. The governor's home was also set on fire.There were also reports of protests in Damascus, Deir ez-Zor, Homs, Latakia and Raqqa. A witness said that in Sanamayn, security forces killed 20 people.17 people were killed during a demonstration on the way to Daraa, while 40 were killed near Omari Mosque, 25 died in al-Sanameen in Homs, 4 in Latakia, 3 in Damascus.
Religious and political leaders in exile began to get involved in the conflict. The Sunni cleric Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi gave a sermon in Qatar, in which he said:
“ Today the train of revolution has arrived at a station that it was destined to reach, the Syrian station. It isn't possible for Syria to detach itself from the history of the Arab nation.”
AFP reported that Syrian opposition leaders-in-exile called in Paris for the deposition of President al-Assad, asking France to maintain pressure on the Syrian leader to "halt the killing of innocents."
On 26 March, the first signs were seen that the government was willing to make concessions to the protestors, when al-Assad announced the release of as many as 200 political prisoners.The next day, Buthaina Shaaban, al-Assad's media adviser, stated that the emergency law would be lifted, without giving any indication of when this would happen. On 29 March, the Syrian newspaper Al-Watan reported that a major cabinet reshuffle was coming,[91] and later that day, al-Assad accepted the official resignation of the government led by Muhammad Naji al-Otari, while the latter would serve as caretaker prime minister until a new government was selected and officially announced.[
Forces loyal to al-Assad also mobilized. The Grand Mufti of Syria, Ahmad Bader Hassoun, said "Any citizen has the right to protest and call for freedom, but I will tell you, all those behind the bloodshed will be penalized. There are no army officials who opened fire at protesters, they only retaliated out of self-defense. After what happened, there should be reconciliation between the people. There are some corrupters in the country and the corrupters should be penalized". On 29 March, hundreds of thousands demonstrated in support of President al-Assad in Damascus, Aleppo, Hasaka, Homs, Tartous and Hama. On 30 March, al-Assad made a speech blaming foreign conspirators for the uprising and declaring that the emergency law would not be lifted as previously confirmed by Bouthaina Shaaban, and instead that the lifting of the emergency law would be left to studies for future application. A YouTube video of a CNN report shows Syrian State television footage of a woman allegedly attacking al-Assad’s car following his speech on Wednesday.Disappointed by al-Assad's speech, protesters took to the street in Latakia, where they were fired on by police.The next day, Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) reported that al-Assad issued a decree raising the wages of state employees, starting 1 April.
April: On 8 April 2011, protesters in Douma, a Damascus suburb, display signs saying "No for destroying" and "Peaceful"After online calls for a "Friday of Martyrs" (Arabic: جمعة الشهداء‎) on 1 April, thousands of protesters emerged from Friday's prayers and took to the streets in multiple cities around Syria. Security forces opened fire on about 1,000 protesters in the suburb of Damascus, Douma, killing eight. In Damascus, hundreds gathered in Al Rifai mosque to protest after Friday prayers; however, government forces reportedly sealed the mosque and attacked those who tried to leave. Further south, in a small city outside Daraa, a demonstrator was killed during a protest.The conflict gradually began to attract more attention from the international community. On 1 April, Syrian authorities closed a border crossing between Syria and Turkey and banned Turkish and foreign reporters from entering Syria.The next day Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan said that he would put pressure on al-Assad to implement reforms.
On 3 April, al-Assad appointed Adel Safar as the new Syrian prime minister and charged him with the task of forming a new government.[105] On 6 April, al-Assad's government offered concessions to Sunnis and Kurds. The government allowed teachers once again to wear the niqab, closed the country's only casino, and offered that tens of thousands of Kurds residing in Syria would soon be granted Syrian citizenship.
Protests in Homs, Syria, 18 April 2011 on YouTube:
The day of 8 April became known as the "Friday of Resistance" (Arabic: جمعة الصمود‎), as thousands of protesters took to the streets in Daraa, Latakia, Tartus, Edlib, Baniyas, Qamishli, Homs and the Damascus suburb of Harasta, in the largest protest yet. 27 anti-government protesters were killed in Daraa and many other were wounded when security forces opened fire with rubber bullets and live rounds to disperse stone-throwing protesters. At least three people were killed in Damascus' suburb city of Harasta and two people were killed and dozens wounded in Homs, Syria's third largest city. A human rights group said 37 people were killed in uprising across the country on this Friday
Towards the middle of April, uprising became more extensive, and more violent. On 15 April, tens of thousands of people held protests in several Syrian cities, including Baniyas, Latakia, Baida, Homs, and Deir ez-Zor. Al Jazeera reported that up to 50,000 protesters trying to enter Damascus from the Douma suburb were dispersed by security forces using tear gas, while in the Barzeh district of the capital violence erupted when dozens of armed men in plain clothes surrounded about 250 protesters rallying in front of a mosque. On the other hand, thousands demonstrated in Daraa, but security forces were not visible in the city, as the authorities reportedly allowed the protests to take place. Al-Assad announced the release of hundreds of prisoners that were "not involved in criminal acts", and that a new government had been formed (see Cabinet of Syria).
Armed security forces in Daraa, 9 April:
Two days later, al-Assad spoke to the People's Assembly in a televised speech, stating that he expected his government to lift the emergency law the following day, and acknowledging there is a gap between citizens and the state, and that government has to "keep up with the aspirations of the people". On 19 April, the government approved a bill lifting the country's emergency laws.This was the first time in 48 years that the state of emergency had been lifted. On April 21, al-Assad signed the decrees for ending the state of emergency, abolishing the Supreme State Security Court (SSSC), and regulating the right to peaceful demonstrations.
The lifting of the emergency law failed to placate the protesters. On 22 April, the country experienced its biggest and bloodiest day in the current series of uprising as tens of thousands took to the streets. Protests occurred in the capital, Damascus, and in at least ten other cities in the country. Hundreds of protesters in central Damascus were dispersed, but thousands congregated in towns ringing the capital. According to the protesters' own reports, at least 70 people were killed nationwide when security forces opened fire on the demonstrators. Immediate verification was difficult because Syria had expelled almost all members of the international media from the country, although it eventually emerged that over 100 had been killed.

On 23 April, the following day, funerals for fallen protesters occurred throughout the country. Snipers reportedly fired, killing 8 people in Daraa, including 5 members of the security forces. That night, plainclothes security forces raided homes and arrested activists. Dozens of citizens went missing following the Good Friday protests, with one human rights group reporting 217 disappearances between Friday and Sunday.
On 25 April, the Syrian government deployed tanks to Daraa, which was an early focal point of the protests, killing at least 25 people.The tanks were accompanied by soldiers—estimates varied from hundreds to 6,000—rooftop snipers, and the cutting of water, power, and phone lines. One resident said that protesters had burned an army car and taken a soldier hostage.The government also closed the nearby border with Jordan. At least one high-ranking Syrian military commander refused to participate in the operation against Daraa. A resident of Daraa said to media reporters over the phone: "Let Obama come and take Syria. Let Israel come and take Syria. Let the Jews come. Anything is better than Bashar Assad."
U.S. President Barack Obama condemned the "outrageous" use of violence, and the U.S. prepared to freeze Syrian officials' American assets. EU countries, including permanent Security Council members France and the U.K., pushed the U.N. for international sanctions, though it remained unclear whether permanent council members Russia and China would support them. Syria said it was responding to an Islamist-inspired uprising.

On 28 April, Al Jazeera aired footage of what appear to be injured soldiers receiving aid from civilians in Syria, reportedly after they refused orders to shoot at protesters and were fired upon by loyalist units. The network warned it could not independently verify the authenticity of the footage but claimed that it came from a "reliable source".
Despite a harsh crackdown in Deraa, Douma, and other towns, protesters appeared undeterred on 29 April, when thousands rallied in Aleppo, Homs, Deir Alzour, Sheik Meskeen, Damascus, and other areas across Syria. An anonymous person posted what appeared to be video of soldiers in Sheik Meskeen attacking and killing unarmed protesters with live ammunition. Al Jazeera reported that at least 50 people were claimed dead as a result of the security forces' response to the protests, which started after Friday noon prayers.Reuters put the death toll at 62.
Alleged Iranian involvement: U.S. president Barack Obama has recently accused Iran of secretly aiding Bashar al-Assad in his efforts to quell the protests. U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice has stated that there is evidence of active Iranian support for the Syrian government's crackdown on demonstrators. Iran has denied any involvement in suppressing the protests.
Reactions, Domestic Arrests and convictions:
Days before protests planned for 5 February, Syrian authorities arrested several political activists, such as businessman Ghassan al-Najar, leader of the Islamic Democratic movement,[145][146] the writer Ali al-Abdallah,[147] Abbas Abbas, from the Syrian Communist Party[148] and several other political personalities of Kurdish background, such as Adnan Mustafa.[149]
On 14 February, blogger and student Tal al-Mallohi was convicted of spying for the United States and sentenced to five years in prison. Washington denied these allegations and asked for al-Mallohi's immediate release. On 15 February under pressure from human rights organizations, the Syrian government released Ghassan al-Najar after he went on a hunger strike following his arrest for calling for mass protests.[150]

On 22 March Syrian authorities arrested Loay Hussein, a human rights campaigner.[151] On 25 March there were reports of mass arrests and detentions of protesters taking place.[88]


CensorshipOn 5 February, Internet services were said to have been curbed, although Facebook and YouTube were reported to have been restored three days later.[152] Suggestions were made that easing the ban could be a way to track activists.[153]


Concessions On 19 March by legislative decree 35, al-Assad shortened the length of mandatory army conscription from 21 months to 18 months.[154][155]






On 20 March, the Syrian government announced that it would release 15 children who had been arrested on 6 March for writing pro-democracy graffiti.[75]






On 23 March, by regional decree 120, Faisal Ahmad Kolthoum was removed as Governor of Daraa.[156][18]






On 24 March, al-Assad's media adviser, Buthaina Shaaban, said that the government will be "studying the possibility of lifting the emergency law and licensing political parties". The Syrian government also announced a cut in personal taxation rates, an increase in public sector salaries of 1,500 Syrian pounds ($32.60 US) a month and pledges to increase press freedom, create more employment opportunities, and reduce corruption.[82][157][158]






On 26 March, Syrian authorities freed more than 200 political prisoners – 70 according to other sources – mostly Islamists, held in Saidnaya prison.[159]






On 27 March, Bouthaina Shaaban confirmed that the emergency law would be lifted, but did not say when.[90]






On 29 March, the Syrian Government submitted its official resignation to al-Assad.[92]






On 31 March, al-Assad set up a committee of legal experts to study legislation that would pave the way to replacing decades-old emergency laws. The committee was to complete its study by 25 April. Al-Assad also set up a judicial committee tasked with investigating the circumstances that led to the death of Syrian civilians and security forces in the cities of Daraa and Latakia.[160]






On 6 April, it was reported that teachers would once again be allowed to wear the niqab, and that the government has closed the country's only casino.[106]






On 7 April, al-Assad relieved the Governor of Homs province from his duties and issued a decree granting nationality to thousands of Kurds living in the eastern al Hasakah province[161] while the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the 48 Kurds were released, more than a year after they were arrested in the eastern city of Raqqa.[162] This came a day after al-Assad met with Kurdish tribal leaders to discuss citizenship issues concerning the Kurds of Syria’s north-eastern provinces, as hundreds of thousands of Kurds were stripped of their citizenship rights as a result of the 1962 national census.[163]






On 16 April, al-Assad spoke to the People's Assembly in a televised speech, stating that he expected his government to lift the emergency law the following week. He acknowledged there is a gap between citizens and the state, and that government has to "keep up with the aspirations of the people".[117] Later in the day he welcomed the new ministers in the Cabinet of Syria with a speech containing more specifics (full text). He spoke of the importance of reaching "a state of unity, unity between the government, state institutions and the people"; stressed the need for dialogue and consultation in multiple channels, popular support, trust and transparency; explained the interrelatedness of reform and the needs of citizens for services, security and dignity. He stated the first priorities were citizenship for Kurds, lifting the state of emergency in the coming week or at the latest the week after, regulating demonstrations without chaos and sabotage, political party law, local administration law in both structure and elections, and new and modern media law, all with public timeframes. The next topics were unemployment, the economy, rural services, attracting investment, the public and private sectors, justice, corruption, petty bribery, tax reform and reducing government waste, followed by tackling government itself with more participation, e-government, decentralization, effectiveness and efficiency, as well as closer cooperation with civil society, mass organizations and trade unions.






On 19 April, a bill was approved by the Syrian government to lift the emergency law.[164] Two days later, al-Assad signed legislative decree 50 into law.[120][119]






[edit] Counter-demonstrationsOn 22 March there were reports in The Guardian that the Syrian authorities had been organising pro-Assad rallies and distributing propaganda blaming the unrest on saboteurs and infiltrators.[165] On 25 March, pro-Assad rallies were held in Damascus.[88]






[edit] OtherOn 8 March, SANA, the official Syrian news agency, published an article on its website titled "President al-Assad issued a decree provides for a legislative grant amnesty for political crimes committed before the date of 2011-03-08". Three hours later, the publication was removed.[166] Hours later, Syrian authorities released Haitham al-Maleh, an 80-year-old former judge, one of al-Assad's most outspoken critics, under an amnesty marking the anniversary of the 1963 coup which brought the Ba'ath Party to power.[167][168] Twelve Syrian human rights organisations called on the government to scrap the state of emergency which has been in effect for almost 50 years.[169]






On 12 March, newly released Haitham al-Maleh announced in a YouTube video his support and assistance to the Syrian youth who are behind the new wave of protests and hoped that he will soon see democracy in Syria.[170]






On 16 February regime critic and director of the Organisation for Democracy and Freedom in Syria (ODFS) Ribal al-Assad, son of Rifaat al-Assad and cousin to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, held a press conference in London, in which he made it clear that he "does not want to see a Syrian revolution, but a peaceful change of power".[171] On April 5 interview, Ribal al-Assad warned of Syria's risk for a civil war, saying[172]






“ Everyone in Syria has seen what is happening in Arab countries but in Syria there are many minorities. Everyone has arms and everyone will want to defend their own people. It is like what happened in Iraq. ”






[edit] International[edit] Supranational European Union – On 22 March, Catherine Ashton, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, issued a statement which said that the European Union "strongly condemns the violent repression, including through the use of live ammunition, of peaceful protests in various locations across Syria".[173]


UN – On 18 March, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon described the use of deadly force against protesters by the Syrian authorities as "unacceptable".[174]


[edit] States


Demonstration in Montreal on 27 March, in solidarity with the anti-regime protestors


Rally in 2011 in support of Syrian President al-Assad in Sydney Australia – On 25 March, Australian foreign minister Kevin Rudd said: "we are deeply sceptical about the official explanations as to what has happened with the various killings which have occurred in Daraa .... And we call directly on the Syrian Government to exercise restraint in their response to peaceful protest seeking democratic change."[175]


Canada – On 21 March, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon stated: "Canada deplores the multiple deaths and injuries following protests in several Syrian cities over the weekend."[176] On 24 April, Foreign Affairs advised Canadians not to travel to Syria, and for those in Syria to consider leaving by commercial means while these were still available.[177]


France – The Foreign Ministry condemned the violence carried out against demonstrators, and called for political prisoners to be freed.[178] On 23 March, French foreign ministry spokesman Bernard Valero called on Syria to carry out immediate political reforms.[179]


Germany – On 24 March, German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said: "The violence must end immediately. The Syrian government must make sure that basic human and civil rights, as well as the rule of law, is observed,"[180]


Greece – On 24 March, Greek Foreign Minister Dimitrios Droutsas said: "The use of violence to repress protests that has led to the murder of citizens is absolutely condemned. We call on the government of Syria to guarantee the fundamental rights of its citizens".[181]


Iraq – On 3 April, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki called Syria's President and voiced Iraq’s support of Syria "in the face of conspiracies targeting Syria’s stability".[182]


Israel – On 24 March, Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Avigdor Lieberman said: "the same principles, activities the Western world [has taken] in Libya ... I hope to see those regarding the Iranian regime and the Syrian regime.".[183] Israel expressed concern that Assad will try to divert the attention from the uprising in Syria and try to provoke some border incidents with Israel in the Golan Heights, Lebanon or Gaza or even start a war with Israel in order to unite the the Syrian people against Israel and to divert the media attention from the uprising in Syria.[184][185]


Lebanon – On 31 March, Prime Minister-designate Najib Mikati commended the "ending of the chance to cause strife in Syria" as well as the Syrian people’s support for their president[186] Also, President Michel Suleiman highlighted the importance of stability in Syria, and its positive impact on the security of and economic situation in Lebanon and Syria.[187]


Mexico – Mexico's government issued a statement through the Secretariat of Foreign Affairs in which it condemns the violent events, calls on Syrian authorities to refrain from the use of force and to facilitate political dialogue which includes its citizens more. [188]


Norway – On 24 March, Norwegian minister of foreign affairs Jonas Gahr Støre condemned the violence, saying: "Norway urges the authorities of Syria not to use violence against peaceful protesters, to respect the freedom of speech and assembly, and to enter into a dialogue with the people about their legitimate demands".[189]


Qatar – On 3 April, Qatari Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani sent a letter to Syrian President al-Assad voicing Qatar’s support for Syria amid attempts at destabilization.[190]


Russia – On 6 April, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called al-Assad to voice support for the latter’s decision to make reforms in his country.[191]


Saudi Arabia – On 28 March, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia expressed his support to the Syrian leadership in a telephone conversation with President al-Assad, claiming that the uprising is in fact a conspiracy targeting the legitimate government. Relations between Syria and Saudi Arabia have been strained and even hostile for decades. However, the position of the Saudi monarch is an indication of their recent improvement.[192]


Sudan – On 6 April, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir called al-Assad to voice his support for Syria against "the attempts aimed at destabilizing it".[193]


Turkey – On 21 March, Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoğlu said: "Syria is on an important threshold. We hope problems between the people and the administration [in Syria] can be handled without trouble."[194]


United Arab Emirates – On 29 March, United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan called Syrian President al-Assad, and reaffirmed that the UAE stands by Damascus.[195]


United Kingdom – On 24 March, British Foreign Secretary William Hague said: "We call on the government of Syria to respect their people's right to peaceful protest, and to take action about their legitimate grievances,"[196]


United States – President Barack Obama's administration condemned the use of violence, stating: “The United States stands for a set of universal rights, including the freedom of expression and assembly, and believes that governments, including the Syrian government, must address the legitimate aspirations of their people."[197] Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that it was unlikely the US would intervene in Syria, since the US Congress views al-Assad as "a reformer".[198][199] On 9 April, it was reported that Obama had said:


“ I strongly condemn the abhorrent violence committed against peaceful protesters by the Syrian government today and over the past few weeks. I also condemn any use of violence by protesters ... I call upon the Syrian authorities to refrain from any further violence against peaceful protesters ... Furthermore, the arbitrary arrests, detention, and torture of prisoners that has been reported must end now, and the free flow of information must be permitted so that there can be independent verification of events on the ground ... Violence and detention are not the answer to the grievances of the Syrian people. It is time for the Syrian government to stop repressing its citizens, and to listen to the voices of the Syrian people calling for meaningful political and economic reforms.[200] ”






Venezuela – It was reported on 26 March that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez had said: "Now some supposed political protest movements have begun [in Syria], a few deaths ... and now they are accusing the president of killing his people and later the Yankees will come to bomb the people to save them ... How cynical is the new format the empire has invented, to generate violent conflict, generate blood in a country, to later bombard it, intervene and take over its natural resources and convert it into a colony."[201]


[edit] NGOsAmnesty International condemned the "violent crackdown", against "a peaceful protest" by people calling for the release of political prisoners.[202]


Human Rights Watch stated that the Syrian government has shown "no qualms about shooting dead its own citizens for speaking out." It also said that Syrian people have shown "incredible courage in daring to protest publicly against one of the most repressive governments in the region, and they shouldn't have to pay with their lives."[203][204]


[edit] IndividualsEgyptian Islamic theologian Yusuf al-Qaradawi declared his support for the uprising against what he called Syria's "suppressive regime", saying that it commits "atrocities". He called for victory against the ruling Ba'ath Party, and opined that the army would be the major factor in the revolt.[205] Al-Qaradawi said all Arabs should support the uprising in Syria, saying "Today the train of revolution has reached a station that it had to reach: The Syria station", and "It is not possible for Syria to be separated from the history of the Arab community".[206] The Muslim Brotherhood, with which al-Qaradawi has been involved for several years,[207][208] assisted in the uprising, with Islamic clergy calling on Sunnis to pour onto the streets throughout Syria and expel the Alawi regime.[209]
A protester in Daraa holds a placard thanking the BBC while another makes fun of a local TV channel.Under criticism from Internet activists for failing to acknowledge the Syrian uprising, Al Jazeera provided analysis of the largest opposition parties in Syria that might have great political influence in any change of power: Syrian People's Democratic Party, Muslim Brotherhood, National Salvation Front, Movement for Justice and Development, Reform Party, Arab Socialist Movement, Arab Socialist Union, Workers Revolutionary Party, Communist Party of Labour, and others.[210] On 9 March, Al Jazeera continued its reporting with an analysis of political detainees in Syria,[211] and two days later another special report reported that many activists indicated displeasure that the general decree of amnesty did not include political prisoners.[212] Al Jazeera launched an internet page for the Syrian revolt as part of their "Arab Revolution Spring" portal