Sunday, October 21, 2012


Middle Eastern oil and gas companies have been targeted in massive attacks on their computer networks in an increasingly open cyber war where a new virus was discovered just this past week.

The United States and Israel, believed to behind the first cyber sabotage campaign that targeted Iran's nuclear program, are now worried about becoming targeted themselves.

"There have been increasing efforts to carry out cyber attacks on Israel's computer infrastructure," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said earlier this month, without giving details.

Netanyahu spoke just days after Washington issued a veiled warning to Iran over digital attacks and outlined a new digital warfare doctrine.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta also referred publicly for the first time about the "Shamoon" virus that hit Saudi Arabia's state oil company Aramco in August, disabling more than 300,000 computers.

The virus also hit Rasgas, a joint venture between US oil firm Exxon Mobil Corp and state-controlled Qatar Petroleum.

Panetta called the sophisticated virus "the most destructive attack that the private sector has seen to date."

It took Aramco, the world's biggest oil company, two weeks after the August 15 attack to restore its main internal network, but the group said that oil production had not been disrupted.

However the threat that digital attacks could cripple vital infrastructure is real, with Panetta warning of the possibility of a "cyber-Pearl Harbor" to justify a policy of moving aggressively against threats.

A disruption to Saudi Arabia's oil exports could cause oil prices to spike from their already elevated prices and tip the fragile global economy into recession.

In what was interpreted as a veiled threat against Iran, Panetta said the U.S. military "has developed the capability to conduct effective operations to counter (cyber) threats to our national interests."

A senior U.S. administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told AFP the cyber-attack on the Gulf oil giants was believed to be carried out by a "state actor" and acknowledged that Iran would be a prime suspect.

U.S. officials have "more than a suspicion" that Iran was to blame for the August attacks, said James Lewis, who has worked for the State Department and other government agencies on national security and cyber issues and who is now a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.

He said the U.S. authorities were used to cyber espionage from Russia and China, but were surprised by the swift rise in Iran's digital warfare capability.

"A lot of people didn't think it would develop this quickly," he said.

However it is unsurprising that Iran would seek a cyber-warfare capability after having hundreds of centrifuges used to enrich uranium ruined by the Stuxnet virus in 2010.

Stuxnet marked a transformation for computer viruses, which had previously been used for spying or by organized crime, into a tool for sabotage.

It is widely suspected to have been the work of the United States and Israel, which believe Iran's nuclear program aims to produce a bomb.

Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful uses only. Iran has been victim of other digital attacks as well.

In April it was forced to unplug computers at its Kharg oil terminal from the Internet after they came under cyber-attack, and in November last year an explosion at a missile terminal was attributed by U.S. media to a computer virus.

Only 'scratched the surface' of cyber warfare in Middle East

Kaspersky Labs, which detected the "Flame" and "Gauss" viruses believed behind those attacks, announced Monday it had found a new cyber espionage weapon it dubbed "miniFlame.”

It described the virus as "a high precision, surgical attack tool ... designed to steal data and control infected systems during targeted cyber espionage operations."

Kaspersky said "we have only just scratched the surface of the massive cyber espionage operations ongoing in the Middle East. Their full purpose remains obscure and the identity of the victims and the attackers remains unknown."

Christian Harbulot, the head of the Economic Warfare School in Paris, warned that "it is extremely difficult to undo the knot" in what is also a propaganda war.

He said Iran could be behind the "Shamoon" virus, but that "it could be an additional pretext to weaken Iran" which is already under international embargo over its nuclear program.

For Nicolas Arpagian at France's National Institute of Advanced Security and Justice Studies, the latest attacks "show that arsenal of digital weapons is getting bigger, and that when you have such an arsenal the use of cyber weapons is bound to become more commonplace."

Thursday, October 4, 2012


After years of a close alliance during which the pair almost exclusively directed Israel’s campaign against Iran’s nuclear program, Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Barak have been trading the kind of barbs that would appear, at least for now, to mean an end to that kind of intimate cooperation.
Rift Between Israeli Leaders: From New York Times

Underlying the argument is a competition over who can best steer Israel’s Iran policy and other national security mainstays like the Palestinian issue. Those differences, while not new, are coming to the forefront now because Mr. Netanyahu may soon call for early elections, perhaps scheduling a vote for February.
Israelis are prepared — or not —for an Iran attack
Just weeks after Mr. Netanyahu was perceived by critics as having meddled in America’s presidential election by criticizing President Obama’s approach to Iran, the Israeli leader’s strained relations with Washington are emerging as a hot electoral issue in Israel. Israelis are anxious about the prospect of an attack on Iran without close American coordination, and they generally view strong ties with the United States as crucial, framing Mr. Netanyahu’s clash with the White House as a rare political weakness.

“Barak understands that elections are on the horizon,” said Shmuel Sandler, a politics and foreign policy expert at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University. “He wants to separate himself from Netanyahu. What is his claim to fame? That he has good relations with Washington.”
On Wednesday, Mr. Netanyahu’s loyalists accused the defense minister of using his recent trip to the United States to differentiate himself from the prime minister and move away from the recent friction with the Obama administration.
“As far as I know, yes, he distanced himself in an attempt to make political gains,” Yisrael Katz, the minister of transportation, told Israel Radio.
More international coverage from NBC News
Mr. Katz was echoing remarks attributed to Mr. Netanyahu from a closed meeting on Tuesday. Mr. Netanyahu was quoted in the Israeli news media as saying that Mr. Barak had deliberately exacerbated the tensions between the prime minister and Washington in an attempt to make himself look like the moderate who can repair relations.

In response, Mr. Barak’s office issued a statement saying that the defense minister “works to strengthen relations with the United States and at their heart, the security relationship.”
“The importance of the special security and intelligence relations built up over the past five years during which Barak has served as the minister of defense should not be forgotten,” the statement added. “Those special relations contribute directly to the security and interests of Israel.”
Reuters sources: Azerbaijan explores aiding Israel against Iran
Critics said that Mr. Netanyahu and his supporters were trying to deflect blame for the bad blood between the prime minister and Mr. Obama.
“Barak was trying to calm the waters while Netanyahu was making statements that raised the temperature,” said Shlomo Avineri, a professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The prime minister has grown “uncomfortable,” he said, with the image of Mr. Barak as “the responsible adult.”
Pugnacious Iran president rips Israel, US ahead of final UN speech
'Only politics'Israeli general elections are scheduled for October 2013, but Mr. Netanyahu has made it known that if he cannot reach agreement with his coalition partners on what he calls a “responsible” budget within 10 days, he will call an early vote.
Image: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton meets with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak
Louis Lanzano / AP
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton meets with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak in New York during the 67th United Nations General Assembly, Sunday, Sept. 23, 2012.
Nahum Barnea, a columnist at the newspaper Yediot Aharonot, wrote Wednesday that the budget has a shortfall of nearly $4 billion and that the only way to cover it is by a significant cut in the defense budget, since alternatives like raising taxes or cutting services cannot be done in an election year.

“There is nothing personal in Netanyahu’s offending statements against Barak,” Mr. Barnea wrote, adding that the background to the dispute was “only politics.”
Mr. Netanyahu leads the conservative-leaning Likud Party while Mr. Barak, a former Labor Party leader long unpopular with the electorate, leads the tiny, centrist Independence faction. Recent polls indicate that Mr. Netanyahu remains unrivaled as a contender for the post of prime minister, while Mr. Barak’s party is struggling to cross the electoral threshold for a seat in Parliament.
Interactive: Israel's border (on this page)But in the Israeli multiparty political system, leadership also depends on the art of coalition building.
According to political experts here, Mr. Barak had wanted a guarantee from Mr. Netanyahu that he would continue to serve as defense minister in the next government, but there was strong opposition from within Mr. Netanyahu’s party.
Instead, Mr. Barak has been trying to carve out an agenda of his own to appeal to voters. With the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations long stalled, he recently proposed a unilateral plan for creating a separate Palestinian state that would have Israel annexing parts of the West Bank and withdrawing from others.
Netanyahu: Draw 'clear red line' to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons
Most pointedly, though, he has been accentuating his relationship with the Americans. He has praised American preparedness for dealing with Iran and, after Mr. Netanyahu infuriated the Obama administration by demanding that it set so-called red lines on Iran, Mr. Barak issued a statement saying that differences between Israel and the United States on such a critical issue should be worked through “behind closed doors.”
Underscoring their shared security interests, the two countries are scheduled to hold a joint military exercise next month to practice the defense of Israel against long-range missile attack.
Video: U.S.-Israel relationship a ‘very powerful bond’ (on this page)When Mr. Netanyahu was voted in, part of his appeal was his familiarity with the workings of Washington and his ability, as some here say, to “speak American.”
But when it comes to the Israeli electorate and relations with the United States, Mr. Avineri of the Hebrew University said, “There is a complexity.”
“On one hand, Israelis like leaders who stand up to the Americans, but on issues of national consensus within Israel,” he said. “On the other hand, they do not like a leader manufacturing a crisis on an issue where there is probably no reason to create a crisis.”
This story, "Rift Grows Between Israeli Leaders Over Relations With U.S.", originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright © 2012 The New York Times

Discuss:

Most active discussions
  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments
  1. Image: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (R) and Defense Minister Ehud Barak
    Uriel Sinai / Getty Images, file
    Jump to textA growing rift between Prime Minister Benjamin N...
  2. Jump to videoNetanyahu: Iran months away from nu...
  3. Jump to interactiveIsrael's border
  4. Jump to discussionRift grows between Israeli leaders over relation...