Sunday, October 21, 2012


Middle Eastern oil and gas companies have been targeted in massive attacks on their computer networks in an increasingly open cyber war where a new virus was discovered just this past week.

The United States and Israel, believed to behind the first cyber sabotage campaign that targeted Iran's nuclear program, are now worried about becoming targeted themselves.

"There have been increasing efforts to carry out cyber attacks on Israel's computer infrastructure," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said earlier this month, without giving details.

Netanyahu spoke just days after Washington issued a veiled warning to Iran over digital attacks and outlined a new digital warfare doctrine.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta also referred publicly for the first time about the "Shamoon" virus that hit Saudi Arabia's state oil company Aramco in August, disabling more than 300,000 computers.

The virus also hit Rasgas, a joint venture between US oil firm Exxon Mobil Corp and state-controlled Qatar Petroleum.

Panetta called the sophisticated virus "the most destructive attack that the private sector has seen to date."

It took Aramco, the world's biggest oil company, two weeks after the August 15 attack to restore its main internal network, but the group said that oil production had not been disrupted.

However the threat that digital attacks could cripple vital infrastructure is real, with Panetta warning of the possibility of a "cyber-Pearl Harbor" to justify a policy of moving aggressively against threats.

A disruption to Saudi Arabia's oil exports could cause oil prices to spike from their already elevated prices and tip the fragile global economy into recession.

In what was interpreted as a veiled threat against Iran, Panetta said the U.S. military "has developed the capability to conduct effective operations to counter (cyber) threats to our national interests."

A senior U.S. administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told AFP the cyber-attack on the Gulf oil giants was believed to be carried out by a "state actor" and acknowledged that Iran would be a prime suspect.

U.S. officials have "more than a suspicion" that Iran was to blame for the August attacks, said James Lewis, who has worked for the State Department and other government agencies on national security and cyber issues and who is now a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.

He said the U.S. authorities were used to cyber espionage from Russia and China, but were surprised by the swift rise in Iran's digital warfare capability.

"A lot of people didn't think it would develop this quickly," he said.

However it is unsurprising that Iran would seek a cyber-warfare capability after having hundreds of centrifuges used to enrich uranium ruined by the Stuxnet virus in 2010.

Stuxnet marked a transformation for computer viruses, which had previously been used for spying or by organized crime, into a tool for sabotage.

It is widely suspected to have been the work of the United States and Israel, which believe Iran's nuclear program aims to produce a bomb.

Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful uses only. Iran has been victim of other digital attacks as well.

In April it was forced to unplug computers at its Kharg oil terminal from the Internet after they came under cyber-attack, and in November last year an explosion at a missile terminal was attributed by U.S. media to a computer virus.

Only 'scratched the surface' of cyber warfare in Middle East

Kaspersky Labs, which detected the "Flame" and "Gauss" viruses believed behind those attacks, announced Monday it had found a new cyber espionage weapon it dubbed "miniFlame.”

It described the virus as "a high precision, surgical attack tool ... designed to steal data and control infected systems during targeted cyber espionage operations."

Kaspersky said "we have only just scratched the surface of the massive cyber espionage operations ongoing in the Middle East. Their full purpose remains obscure and the identity of the victims and the attackers remains unknown."

Christian Harbulot, the head of the Economic Warfare School in Paris, warned that "it is extremely difficult to undo the knot" in what is also a propaganda war.

He said Iran could be behind the "Shamoon" virus, but that "it could be an additional pretext to weaken Iran" which is already under international embargo over its nuclear program.

For Nicolas Arpagian at France's National Institute of Advanced Security and Justice Studies, the latest attacks "show that arsenal of digital weapons is getting bigger, and that when you have such an arsenal the use of cyber weapons is bound to become more commonplace."

Thursday, October 4, 2012


After years of a close alliance during which the pair almost exclusively directed Israel’s campaign against Iran’s nuclear program, Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Barak have been trading the kind of barbs that would appear, at least for now, to mean an end to that kind of intimate cooperation.
Rift Between Israeli Leaders: From New York Times

Underlying the argument is a competition over who can best steer Israel’s Iran policy and other national security mainstays like the Palestinian issue. Those differences, while not new, are coming to the forefront now because Mr. Netanyahu may soon call for early elections, perhaps scheduling a vote for February.
Israelis are prepared — or not —for an Iran attack
Just weeks after Mr. Netanyahu was perceived by critics as having meddled in America’s presidential election by criticizing President Obama’s approach to Iran, the Israeli leader’s strained relations with Washington are emerging as a hot electoral issue in Israel. Israelis are anxious about the prospect of an attack on Iran without close American coordination, and they generally view strong ties with the United States as crucial, framing Mr. Netanyahu’s clash with the White House as a rare political weakness.

“Barak understands that elections are on the horizon,” said Shmuel Sandler, a politics and foreign policy expert at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University. “He wants to separate himself from Netanyahu. What is his claim to fame? That he has good relations with Washington.”
On Wednesday, Mr. Netanyahu’s loyalists accused the defense minister of using his recent trip to the United States to differentiate himself from the prime minister and move away from the recent friction with the Obama administration.
“As far as I know, yes, he distanced himself in an attempt to make political gains,” Yisrael Katz, the minister of transportation, told Israel Radio.
More international coverage from NBC News
Mr. Katz was echoing remarks attributed to Mr. Netanyahu from a closed meeting on Tuesday. Mr. Netanyahu was quoted in the Israeli news media as saying that Mr. Barak had deliberately exacerbated the tensions between the prime minister and Washington in an attempt to make himself look like the moderate who can repair relations.

In response, Mr. Barak’s office issued a statement saying that the defense minister “works to strengthen relations with the United States and at their heart, the security relationship.”
“The importance of the special security and intelligence relations built up over the past five years during which Barak has served as the minister of defense should not be forgotten,” the statement added. “Those special relations contribute directly to the security and interests of Israel.”
Reuters sources: Azerbaijan explores aiding Israel against Iran
Critics said that Mr. Netanyahu and his supporters were trying to deflect blame for the bad blood between the prime minister and Mr. Obama.
“Barak was trying to calm the waters while Netanyahu was making statements that raised the temperature,” said Shlomo Avineri, a professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The prime minister has grown “uncomfortable,” he said, with the image of Mr. Barak as “the responsible adult.”
Pugnacious Iran president rips Israel, US ahead of final UN speech
'Only politics'Israeli general elections are scheduled for October 2013, but Mr. Netanyahu has made it known that if he cannot reach agreement with his coalition partners on what he calls a “responsible” budget within 10 days, he will call an early vote.
Image: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton meets with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak
Louis Lanzano / AP
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton meets with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak in New York during the 67th United Nations General Assembly, Sunday, Sept. 23, 2012.
Nahum Barnea, a columnist at the newspaper Yediot Aharonot, wrote Wednesday that the budget has a shortfall of nearly $4 billion and that the only way to cover it is by a significant cut in the defense budget, since alternatives like raising taxes or cutting services cannot be done in an election year.

“There is nothing personal in Netanyahu’s offending statements against Barak,” Mr. Barnea wrote, adding that the background to the dispute was “only politics.”
Mr. Netanyahu leads the conservative-leaning Likud Party while Mr. Barak, a former Labor Party leader long unpopular with the electorate, leads the tiny, centrist Independence faction. Recent polls indicate that Mr. Netanyahu remains unrivaled as a contender for the post of prime minister, while Mr. Barak’s party is struggling to cross the electoral threshold for a seat in Parliament.
Interactive: Israel's border (on this page)But in the Israeli multiparty political system, leadership also depends on the art of coalition building.
According to political experts here, Mr. Barak had wanted a guarantee from Mr. Netanyahu that he would continue to serve as defense minister in the next government, but there was strong opposition from within Mr. Netanyahu’s party.
Instead, Mr. Barak has been trying to carve out an agenda of his own to appeal to voters. With the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations long stalled, he recently proposed a unilateral plan for creating a separate Palestinian state that would have Israel annexing parts of the West Bank and withdrawing from others.
Netanyahu: Draw 'clear red line' to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons
Most pointedly, though, he has been accentuating his relationship with the Americans. He has praised American preparedness for dealing with Iran and, after Mr. Netanyahu infuriated the Obama administration by demanding that it set so-called red lines on Iran, Mr. Barak issued a statement saying that differences between Israel and the United States on such a critical issue should be worked through “behind closed doors.”
Underscoring their shared security interests, the two countries are scheduled to hold a joint military exercise next month to practice the defense of Israel against long-range missile attack.
Video: U.S.-Israel relationship a ‘very powerful bond’ (on this page)When Mr. Netanyahu was voted in, part of his appeal was his familiarity with the workings of Washington and his ability, as some here say, to “speak American.”
But when it comes to the Israeli electorate and relations with the United States, Mr. Avineri of the Hebrew University said, “There is a complexity.”
“On one hand, Israelis like leaders who stand up to the Americans, but on issues of national consensus within Israel,” he said. “On the other hand, they do not like a leader manufacturing a crisis on an issue where there is probably no reason to create a crisis.”
This story, "Rift Grows Between Israeli Leaders Over Relations With U.S.", originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright © 2012 The New York Times

Discuss:

Most active discussions
  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments
  1. Image: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (R) and Defense Minister Ehud Barak
    Uriel Sinai / Getty Images, file
    Jump to textA growing rift between Prime Minister Benjamin N...
  2. Jump to videoNetanyahu: Iran months away from nu...
  3. Jump to interactiveIsrael's border
  4. Jump to discussionRift grows between Israeli leaders over relation...

Monday, September 17, 2012

September 14, 2012, 12:16 pm

Romney Statement on Iran at Odds With His Foreign Policy Advisers’


11:06 p.m. | Updated An updated version of this post can be found here.
1:22 p.m. | Updated As the turmoil in the Middle East thrust foreign policy to the forefront of the presidential campaign, Mitt Romney found himself at odds with his own foreign policy advisers. While two of his advisers in interviews said that Mr. Romney had a different “red line” on Iran from President Obama, Mr. Romney told ABC News that his red line is the same as that of the president.
“My red line is Iran may not have a nuclear weapon,” Mr. Romney said, in an interview that was broadcast on Friday with George Stephanopoulos on “Good Morning America.” “It is inappropriate for them to have the capacity to terrorize the world.”
Though Mr. Romney has repeatedly said that he would have put in place “crippling sanctions” with Iran far before Mr. Obama did, the president has now also implemented sanctions, and Mr. Obama similarly draws his administration’s red line at preventing Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon.
When Mr. Stephanopoulos pointed out that Mr. Romney’s red line was the same as the president’s, Mr. Romney replied, “Yeah, and I laid out what I would do to keep Iran from reaching that red line.”

Meanwhile, however, two of Mr. Romney’s most senior foreign policy advisers, Eliot Cohen and Richard Williamson, were offering a far more muscular stance on Iran. Asked specifically how Mr. Romney’s foreign policy differs from that of the Obama administration, Mr. Romney’s advisers said that he would have already told Iran that he would not allow it to come close to building a bomb.

Mr. Romney, said Mr. Cohen, “would not be content with an Iran one screwdriver’s turn away from a nuclear weapon.” Though he did not say exactly where, in the development of nuclear capacity, Mr. Romney would draw his own red line, Mr. Cohen said that it would be far before Mr. Obama’s own line — at the point of actual weaponization — and that it could be in a different place that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel draws it.
“Once they get a weapon, or on the verge of getting it, it’s too late,” Mr. Cohen said.
The Romney campaign said Friday that there is no change in policy and pointed to the portion of the ABC News interview where he says that Iran should not have “the capacity to terrorize the world.”
“As he said this morning, Gov. Romney’s red line is Iran having a nuclear weapons capacity,” said Andrea Saul, a spokeswoman for the campaign.
The campaign also claims that Mr. Stephanopoulous inadvertently mischaracterized Mr. Obama’s position, saying it was the same as Mr. Romney’s stance; that, they maintain, is the only reason Mr. Romney agreed that he had the same red line as the president. However, Mr. Stephanopoulos twice confirmed with Mr. Romney that he had the same red line as Mr. Obama, and twice Mr. Romney agreed.
“But your red line going forward is the same?” Mr. Stephanopoulos asked, a second time.
“Yes,” came Mr. Romney’s reply.

Follow Ashley Parker on Twitter at @AshleyRParker.
 

    Tuesday, July 24, 2012

    September 17, 2012

    Thank you Zuckerberg's  Facebook and the shifty invisible people of Google YouTube for the Arab Spring! Next time try for Holocaust 2.

    From Anonymous.

    From Madam Pickwick Art Blog

    Posted on by Dave
    The elephant in the room is clearly China. And as Hilary Clinton remarked on her visit to Israel last week, the world is indeed moving fast. China is entering the world stage in a major way, in their own inexorable sweep of pragmatism, and for the most part a buffering effect that could finally put the periods of full-scale warfare to rest, particularly in the Middle East where commercial relations, trade, investment and economics will prove more beneficial for all concerned than wholesale armed confrontation.
    As in Bill Clinton’s line, “it’s the economy stupid,” this has been the trail whereby China invests its foreign exchange surpluses, inflates their economy and raises wages while very carefully managing the volatile valve of political and social reform. Unlike Germany’s self-serving relationship with southern Euro zone nations, China wants the flow of cargo by train, truck, and boat to be moving back to China. It’s doubtful that israel is going to ditch its American boyfriend anytime soon, but its steady and evolving relationship with China seems positive and possibly another notch in climbing towards being a truly international nation. There is still going to be academics like Michael Ignatieff railing against China in a demonizing, one-dimensional manner, but the hoary rhetoric of kleptocracy is way to whiny to posit the reality as anything more than a retreat to seemingly out-of-date models based on Voltaire, Diderot, and the Enlightenment….
    Daniel Pipes ( see link at end) …Two recent developments – Vladimir Putin’s recent trip to the Middle East and the Chinese government’s financing of an Israeli cargo railway – hint at a reshuffling of alliances in the region.
    The Middle East’s most consequential divide is no longer the Arab/Israeli one but the Islamist/non-Islamist one, with Iran in one corner, Israel in the other, and other states somewhere between. It’s far from a linear alignment, with plenty of incongruities; the revolutionary Islamists in Tehran and the evolutionary ones in Ankara, for example, increasingly are at odds, while the Tehran-Damascus axis flourishes as never before.

    —VC and angel investment money has been getting harder to come by for start-ups in the US and Europe, newly-minted billionaires from the Far East — especially China — are searching the world for value investments. They may just find them in Israel, says Edouard Cukierman, director of the prestigious Tel Aviv investment firm that bears his name. To help Chinese investors find opportunities in Israel, Cukierman will be hosting 20 Chinese billionaires this November at the first Go4China event.
    Go4China is based on Cukierman’s successful Go4Europe, which since 1997 has been bringing European investors to Israel….Read More:http://www.timesofisrael.com/chinese-billionaires-to-get-an-israeli-tech-education/ image:http://www.fanpop.com/spots/jackie-chan/images/7836100/title/shanghai-noon-screencap
    The Russian and Chinese actions point to these alliances shaping the foreign policies of outside powers too. Whereas the European Union and the U.S. government are increasingly sympathetic to Islamism, in part as a way to tame their own Muslim populations, Moscow and Beijing have a history of open conflict with their Muslim populations and therefore adopt policies more hostile to Islamism in the Middle East….


    —I was deeply moved by my experience. Standing in the foothills of Judea, Malkah Fleisher, Israeli olah, held a specialized Israeli-designed weapon – one of just a few we have crafted to defend ourselves since breaking away from millennia of victimization – with careful directions being whispered in my ear by a man who himself was groomed to perfect weapons use in the defense of the Jewish people, and went on to do so in one of the most valorous missions the Jewish people have undertaken in 2,000 years. Next to him, his assistant – a former member of the New Zealand military who then became a Christian missionary, ultimately realizing the error of his ways and converting to Judaism, then taking it to the next step by making aliyah. The date of our shooting day: the 27th of Sivan, the eve of the hijacking of that Air France plane so many years ago (on the Jewish calendar – no, we didn’t plan it that way). And all around us – Caliber 3, one of the country’s six state-authorized police, army, counter-terror and special forces training facilities – erected from the bottom up by a Jew who left the United States to join in the greatest mission of all – to build the Jewish state alongside all of us here today.–Read More:http://www.jewishpress.com/news/on-the-anniversary-of-entebbe-malkah-is-home-on-the-range/2012/07/04/2/
    …Which brings us to the president of the Russian Federation. Pinhas Inbari notes at “After Putin’s visit: Are Israel and Russia inching closer together?” that his “decision to begin his tour in Israel, along with the large size of his delegation, indicated that Israel was the focus of the visit, while the PA and Jordan were of secondary importance.” That’s because, despite their major differences on Syria and Iran, the two governments “agree on another, no less relevant issue that dominates political discourse in the Middle East: the concern over the advent of the Muslim Brotherhood to power.”
    Inbari notes how Putin’s trip mirror imaged Obama’s various trips, both stylistically (the holy sites he visited) and substantially (tacitly agreeing with Netanyahu on Palestinian diplomacy). He concludes:
    One should not be deluded into thinking that Israel and Russia have become fast friends and strategic allies. Regretfully, Russia’s best friends in the region are the rogue states of Iran and Syria. Yet, the shared concern regarding the advent of the Muslim Brotherhood and its welcoming by the United States, bring Russia and Israel a little closer.

    —BEIJING, May 22 (Xinhua) — Vice President Xi Jinping met with visiting Israeli Defense Force Chief of Staff Benny Gantz on Tuesday, calling on the militaries of both countries to boost cooperation and promote bilateral relations.
    Xi said friendly and cooperative relations between China and Israel serve not only the fundamental interests of the two countries and two peoples, but

    regional peace and stability.
    Xi said the relationship between the two armed forces, as an important component of bilateral relations, has maintained stable growth in recent years.
    Both militaries should make greater efforts to cooperate and learn from each other, Xi said.
    Read More:http://english.cpc.people.com.cn/66102/7824576.html
    Today’s Chinese deal fits the same template.
    Israel and China today signed historic cooperation agreements to build the Eilat railway and future projects, including the inland canal port north of Eilat. … The main project on the agenda is construction of a cargo rail line that will link Israel’s Mediterranean ports in Ashdod and Haifa with the Eilat Port. There are also plans to extend the line to Jordan’s Aqaba Port. … [Israeli sources indicate that the Chinese] consider the project to be important, as it fits in with China’s global strategy to strengthen critical trade routes. … Tonight, the Israeli delegation will be guests at a special dinner given by the Chinese government. The food will be kosher lemehadrin.Read More:http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2012/07/russia-china-israel-against-islamism

    ADDENDUM:
    ( see link at end) …For the first time, Israel’s exports to Asia surpassed its exports to the United States. The Israel Export Institute said in a report Monday that 21 percent of Israeli exports between October 2011 and January 2012 went to Asian countries, while exports to the US constituted only 20% of Israeli exports.
    The change in export destination was due to a combination of circumstances, institute officials said. Due to the recession in the US and Europe, Israeli companies have been busy developing new markets for their products and services in the Far East — mostly India and China, but also Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, and Vietnam. About 35% of Israeli exports went to the European Union.

    —To promote bilateral ties in culture and economy, the first Forum of Sino-Israeli Cultural and Economic Cooperation was held in Beijing on July 22, 2012.
    Government officials and scholars of two countries specialized in these two fields attended the forum, which is also the opening ceremony of China Institute of Jewish Culture and Economy of China’s University of International Business and Economy(UIBE).
    The institute is established for the aim of boosting cultural and economic exchanges and archiving win-win cooperation between China and Israel by basic research. Robert J. Aumann, professor of Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Nobel laureate in economics, and David Rotem, chairman of Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee of Israel sent congratulatory letters to the institute.
    The institute’s establishment comes at the time when the two countries are celebrating the 20th anniversary of Sino-Israeli diplomatic ties—Read More:http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90883/7885977.html
    The data is somewhat worrying, Institute chairman Ramzi Gabay said at the report’s release, because the US is still the largest single target market for Israeli exports, and a falloff now could mean that Israeli companies will lose market share to competitors when the US economy recovers.
    Nevertheless, the Institute itself is preparing for a future in which Asia dominates the world economy, and is working to build ties with governments, entrepreneurs, and companies in the region to pave the way for future Israeli economic ties. There are already dozens of Israeli companies in China and India, and some of them have already built strong ties with the local market there. The Israel Trade Mission in China lists at least 250 Israeli companies doing business there, and the Export Institute has run numerous seminars designed to help companies get their foot in the Chinese door.Read More:http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-prepares-for-an-asian-future/

    —Mr. Shi Yong thanked the ULAI for initiating and organizing the exchange program, and extended a warm welcome to the Chinese university students. He said the year 2012 marked the 20th anniversary of China-Israel diplomatic ties, which maintained good momentum, and that people-to-people and cultural exchanges had become the third pillar of the bilateral relations after political exchanges and pragmatic cooperation. Mr. Shi hoped the two governments would work together with the local authorities and universities to promote people-to-people and cultural exchanges in the future to cultivate popular support for the bilateral relations.—Read More:http://il.china-embassy.org/eng/sgxw/t954015.htm
    ————————–
    Steve Hadley:As Secretary Paulson points out in his paper, this progress was driven heavily by a perception that it was in the U.S. interest for China to advance economically. And U.S.-China economic relations was really heavily an engine of China economic growth. There is now some question about that, and not so much confidence in the U.S. side that what’s good for China is good for us and good for the world. And so our relations are at a new stage. And what Secretary Paulson has done in his paper is suggest how the United States-China relations should change and what should be its foundations going forward…..
    Hank Paulson: …I often explain to people when they talk about the tension in the trade area, I say, that’s the good news, you know, that 40 years ago we didn’t have any tension in trade, and we didn’t have any trade, and whenever you’ve got an economic relationship, you’re going to have tension. But I do think that the – that this – to the extent this consensus is fraying, and it is fraying, I think it has to do with a number of things. I think it has to do with the success China has had economically. I think it has to do with some of the problems and issues we’ve had, and – which are causing some people to lose confidence. And again, I think that the problems we have have got nothing to do with China or very little to do with China. They – they’re – we just need to look in the mirror, and they’ll be more difficult to solve if China is having problems. But I do think that’s an issue.

    And I think another issue is as China is progressing, I think more and more U.S. companies and U.S. citizens recognize they’re going to be competing selling the kinds of products and the higher-value-added products we like to sell. It – for those that don’t like getting, you know, sandals and toys from China, I think the competition in the future is – we’re going to be talking about aircraft and, you know, higher-value-added products….
    …Almost 47.8 percent of the GDP is investment. Consumption is only 33 percent. And one of the thing (sic) Hank calls for in this paper is they need to move from investment-based economic growth to consumption-based economic growth. But the dilemma, I thought, was shown interestingly in Premier Wen Jiabao, who announced a stimulus package recently. And what was his stimulation – stimulus package? More investment in capital investment through state-owned enterprises to put more people to work. So Hank, when you talk about economic reform, can they – can they break out of this investment-driven economic growth, or is all this talk about transitioning to a consumer-based economy just a lot of hot air?…Read More:http://www.acus.org/event/next-steps-us-china-relations-conversation-hank-paulson-and-steve-hadley/transcript

    Related Posts

    This entry was posted in Feature Article, Ideas/Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
    *
    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: